Skip to main content

Security report for foerderung-leea-mv.de

Förderberatung des Leea e. V. · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Förderberatung des Leea e. V. operates as a regional advisory service focused on facilitating access to funding programs in the energy and climate protection sector within Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany. The organization targets a broad audience including private individuals, companies, municipalities, and institutions, providing technical and funding consultation to support energy system transformation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear communication of services and partners, including government and EU funding bodies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with integration of modern consent management tools such as Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance and user privacy. The site employs standard web technologies including jQuery and Bootstrap, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response disclosures. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Cookie consent is granular and transparent, supporting privacy compliance. The absence of a terms of service page and explicit security policies suggests areas for enhancement in governance and transparency. Overall, the website and organization present a trustworthy and credible profile with a strong focus on energy funding advisory services. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and security policies, and adding a terms of service page to improve legal clarity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foerderung-leea-mv.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention foerderung-leea-mv.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for foerderung-leea-mv.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche regional market in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, focusing on energy transformation funding advisory. Its competitive advantage lies in its government and EU partnerships, enabling access to diverse funding streams. The business model centers on providing independent, proactive consulting services to a wide range of stakeholders, including private citizens, companies, and municipalities. Growth indicators include active event organization and a comprehensive online presence. The partnership ecosystem is robust with multiple government and regional agencies, enhancing credibility and reach. Operationally, the organization leverages digital tools for outreach and compliance, positioning itself as a key facilitator in the regional energy transition landscape.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of a reputable cookie consent management system (Cookiebot), ensuring compliance with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS indicates potential areas for hardening. There is no published incident response or security policy, which could impact readiness and transparency in case of security events. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for the organization's scope but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations, enhancing legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly to reduce risk exposure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic usability testing to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Landeszentrum für erneuerbare Energien Mecklenburg-Vorpommern e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Förderberatung des Leea e. V.
Description
Die Fördermittelprogramme im Bereich Klimaschutz sind über eine große Breite verschiedenster Institutionen und Themen gefächert. Sie haben je nach Zielstellung unterschiedliche Fördergegenstände, Voraussetzungen und mögliche Zuwendungsempfänger. Was fehlt ist eine proaktive und unabhängige Erst-Förderberatung.
Key services
Fördermittelberatung, Technische Beratung, Veranstaltungsorganisation, Informationsvermittlung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Maps iframe (lazy load), FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern cookie consent management.
  2. Clear focus on energy and climate protection funding advice in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with Cookiebot integration.
  4. Contact information is transparent and detailed.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No terms of service page found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks for responsive design and interactivity. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, indicating a modern approach to privacy. The site loads external scripts asynchronously and uses lazy loading for embedded Google Maps, optimizing performance. While the site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD), there is no explicit hosting provider information. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to improve load times and accessibility. The technical stack is standard for small to medium-sized organizations, balancing functionality and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foerderung-leea-mv.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foerderung-leea-mv.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.