Skip to main content

Security report for fnhk.cz

Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové is a major healthcare institution in the Czech Republic, serving as one of the largest medical facilities in Eastern Bohemia. The website provides comprehensive information about clinical services, patient care, research, education, and commercial healthcare offerings. It targets patients, healthcare professionals, employees, and partners, reflecting a public healthcare and research institution business model with a strong market position in the region. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Typekit fonts, and Swiper.js for interactive elements. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good performance and consistent branding. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses multiple security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, although explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies are not publicly available. The WHOIS data confirms the domain's legitimacy and consistency with the institution's identity. Overall, the website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance appropriate for a healthcare provider. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency around incident response, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving cookie consent mechanisms to further strengthen privacy compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fnhk.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fnhk.cz

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
95
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The institution holds a strong market position as a leading healthcare provider and research center in the Czech Republic. Its business model focuses on delivering clinical care, emergency services, medical research, and education. The website reflects a well-established organization with a large operational scale. The presence of certifications and awards enhances trust and credibility. The target audience includes patients, healthcare workers, students, and partners. The institution maintains partnerships, such as with Deafcom for transcription services, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active updates in news and career opportunities. Revenue streams likely include public healthcare funding, commercial services, and research grants. The website's comprehensive content and clear navigation support effective communication with diverse stakeholders.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, and others. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of secure forms with autocomplete disabled enhances input security. However, the absence of publicly available incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies represents a compliance gap. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR aligned, but cookie consent transparency could be improved. The integration of third-party analytics and marketing scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is strong for a healthcare institution, but improvements in incident response transparency and vulnerability disclosure would enhance resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to provide clearer user control and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Consider publicly listing Data Protection Officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
Description
Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové patří k největším zdravotnickým zařízením nejen ve východních Čechách, ale v celé České republice.
Key services
clinical care, emergency services, medical research, education and training, commercial healthcare services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Typekit fonts, Swiper.js carousel, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive information for patients, employees, and partners
  3. Strong presence of healthcare-related content and services
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. Good security posture with HTTPS and security headers
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with Typekit fonts and Swiper.js for interactive carousels. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting and CMS details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical stack appears custom-built or proprietary rather than based on common CMS platforms. Security headers and HTTPS configuration are well implemented, indicating a robust infrastructure. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and transparency around backend technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 82/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fnhk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fnhk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.