Skip to main content

Security report for flyerole.de

FLYERolé! · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FLYERolé! is a German online printing service specializing in a wide range of printed marketing materials including flyers, brochures, business cards, postcards, and promotional items such as banners and T-shirts. The website targets businesses and individuals in Germany seeking affordable and diverse printing solutions. The business operates primarily as an e-commerce platform with a niche focus on retail printing services. The website content is well-structured and provides clear navigation to various product categories, supported by visual banners and product images. Technical infrastructure includes common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site uses a custom or reseller CMS platform and implements basic SEO and accessibility features, though mobile optimization is only basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in security and compliance transparency. The domain WHOIS data is minimal but does not raise immediate concerns. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, improving mobile responsiveness, and publishing detailed security and privacy policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flyerole.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FLYERolé! positions itself as a specialized online print shop serving the German market with a broad product portfolio. Its competitive advantage lies in offering diverse print products with clear pricing examples and easy online ordering. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with a focus on small to medium-sized business customers and individuals. The presence of partner links to design and personnel agencies suggests a modest partnership ecosystem. The website's marketing tools and tracking indicate an intent to optimize customer acquisition and retargeting. However, the lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits transparency. Growth indicators are not explicit but the extensive product catalog and marketing presence imply an established operation. The company could benefit from clearer business identity disclosures and enhanced trust signals to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information is provided, which may hinder effective vulnerability reporting and response. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces privacy considerations, though cookie consent is managed. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices in HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enhance mobile optimization to improve user experience across devices and support accessibility standards.
  4. Include detailed business contact information such as company registration, VAT number, and physical address to increase trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize unnecessary data collection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FLYERolé!
Description
Online printing services specializing in flyers, brochures, business cards, and various printed marketing materials.
Key services
Flyers, Brochures, Business cards, Postcards, Stamps, Banners, Labels, Calendars, T-shirts, Tragetaschen (bags)
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Nivo Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in German targeting German-speaking customers.
  3. Website uses standard tracking and marketing tools.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  5. Contact information is limited to phone and contact form; no emails or physical addresses explicitly found.
  6. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  7. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  8. Website content is focused on printing services with a broad product catalog.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery, Nivo Slider for image carousels, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing. The CMS appears to be a custom or reseller platform, which may limit flexibility and modernization opportunities. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts, but mobile responsiveness is basic and could be improved. SEO is basic with meta descriptions and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. The technical infrastructure is sufficient for current business needs but modernization and optimization could reduce technical debt and improve user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flyerole.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flyerole.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.