Skip to main content

Security report for flutter.com

Flutter Entertainment · Media · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

91/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flutter Entertainment is a leading global operator in the online sports betting and iGaming industry, boasting a strong market presence in the US and worldwide. The company manages a diverse portfolio of well-known brands such as FanDuel, Sky Betting & Gaming, and PokerStars, positioning itself as a market leader with a challenger mindset to innovate and improve the industry. The website content reflects this focus, targeting customers interested in sports betting and online gaming services. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern analytics and consent management technologies including Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, enhancing availability and performance. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are good, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration locked against unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement. The absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and incident response contacts reduces transparency and compliance maturity. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference. The business is legitimate with a long domain history consistent with its enterprise status. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and enhancing security headers to strengthen the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 70 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      8 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching flutter.com

This scan found 9 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
90
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
91

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flutter Entertainment operates in the online gambling and iGaming sector, leveraging a portfolio of major brands to maintain a leading market position. Its business model centers on providing online sports betting and gaming services to a broad customer base, primarily in the US and international markets. The company benefits from scale and brand diversity, which supports competitive advantages and growth potential. Partnerships and subsidiaries are well integrated, with a clear focus on digital engagement and customer experience. Revenue streams likely include betting fees, gaming commissions, and advertising. The company’s strategic use of analytics and consent management tools reflects a data-driven approach to customer insights and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place. Use of Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry and Google Tag Manager for analytics is standard for enterprise sites. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are notable gaps. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are found, which could hinder incident management and transparency. The site does not appear to expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents prominently on the website.
  3. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
Company number 16956
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flutter Entertainment
Description
Flutter is the world’s leading online sports betting and iGaming operator, with a market leading position in the US and across the world. Our ambition is to leverage our significant scale and our challenger mindset to change our industry for the better. Flutter operates a diverse portfolio of leading online sports betting and iGaming brands including FanDuel, Sky Betting & Gaming, Sportsbet, PokerStars, Paddy Power, Sisal, tombola, Betfair, MaxBet, Junglee Games and Adjarabet, and together we’re changing the game.
Key services
online sports betting, iGaming, brand portfolio management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and scripts)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • Use of Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Application Insights, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management with detailed cookie declarations
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content
  4. Multiple trusted brand names under Flutter Entertainment are listed
  5. Use of Microsoft Application Insights and Google Tag Manager indicates mature analytics setup
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No data protection officer contact found
  9. Website content is professional and targeted at online gambling and iGaming customers
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, which likely contributes to good availability and moderate performance. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses asynchronous script loading to optimize page load times. While the site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected. The technical implementation is solid with opportunities for modernization in security headers and DNS security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flutter.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flutter.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.