Skip to main content

Security report for flowics.com

Viz Flowics · Media · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Viz Flowics is a cloud-native platform specializing in live data-driven broadcast graphics, targeting broadcasters, live streamers, and corporations. The platform offers an intuitive web-based HTML5 graphics editor, native data connectors, social media integration, and NRCS integration, positioning itself as a modern solution in the media technology sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence supported by customer testimonials and case studies, indicating a solid market position under its parent company Vizrt. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, though performance metrics are not explicitly available. Security posture is weakened by the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support, which is a critical vulnerability for a platform serving professional clients. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates strong business credibility but requires urgent remediation of its SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flowics.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media and technology sectors, offering SaaS solutions for live broadcast graphics. Its business model revolves around cloud-based subscription services with additional integrations and API access. The target market includes broadcasters and content creators seeking scalable, remote-friendly graphics solutions. The presence of integration partners and a parent company (Vizrt) enhances its competitive advantage. The website's content and testimonials suggest a focus on innovation and customer-centric development. Marketing efforts leverage social media and analytics platforms to optimize reach and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs several security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, alongside HSTS, indicating awareness of basic security best practices. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent a critical security gap, exposing users to potential interception and undermining trust. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site uses secure cookie flags but lacks advanced features like OCSP stapling and session resumption. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires immediate improvements in SSL/TLS configuration and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately obtain and deploy a valid SSL certificate and enable TLS 1.2 or higher to secure all communications.
  2. Implement and publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved security and performance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clearer contact information to improve user trust and compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with a robust tech stack including Fusion Builder, Slider Revolution, and various JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Vimeo Player. It leverages Cloudflare for CDN and caching, and AWS for DNS hosting. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO Premium with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site includes multiple marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager, PixelYourSite, and LinkedIn Insight. Performance data is unavailable, but the presence of caching and CDN suggests moderate to good performance. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses responsive design principles. Technical risks include the invalid SSL certificate and lack of TLS support, which could impact user trust and search rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flowics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flowics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.