Skip to main content

Security report for flot.com

Mil.Press · Media · Russia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mil.Press FLOT is a well-established Russian media portal specializing in naval and military news, history, and educational content. The website serves a niche audience of military professionals, enthusiasts, and researchers, offering a broad range of articles, forums, and multimedia resources. The business operates primarily as a media publisher with advertising as a key revenue stream, supported by related media outlets under the Mil.Press brand. Technically, the site is built on Bitrix CMS with standard JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and advertising scripts, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, which lowers its security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, reflecting a gap in compliance with modern data protection standards. Overall, the domain's long age and consistent registration data support the site's legitimacy, but improvements in security and privacy transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flot.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention flot.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,227
Employees
0
Customers
1,227
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
14%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for flot.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mil.Press FLOT holds a solid position in the Russian military media niche, leveraging a long-standing domain and a network of related media properties. Its business model focuses on content publishing and advertising, targeting a specialized audience interested in naval affairs. The presence of multiple social media channels and partner domains indicates an active engagement strategy. However, the lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may limit trust and user engagement. The site’s content is relevant and professionally curated, but the technical infrastructure shows room for modernization, especially in security and privacy compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS likely enabled (though not explicitly confirmed), but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. The absence of DNSSEC and privacy policies indicates potential vulnerabilities and compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The use of multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet current best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR and user trust compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security and integrity.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to protect against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries, including a dedicated security or abuse email.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve site performance.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Mil.Press
Registration number
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ № ФС77-39156 от 11.03.2010
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mil.Press
Description
Mil.Press FLOT is an informational media portal focused on naval and military topics, providing news, historical data, scientific articles, educational resources, publications, legal information, industry catalogs, welfare content, forums, and blogs related to the Russian Navy and global naval affairs.
Key services
News publishing, Historical and scientific articles, Educational content, Forums and blogs, Advertising platform
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bitrix CMS, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Atrk tracking, Cloudfront CDN
Frameworks
Bitrix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Atrk
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
kashtan.freesea.ru
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Atrk, VK Retargeting
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Russian-language military/naval media portal with extensive content.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or security policies found on the main page.
  3. Multiple advertising scripts and tracking pixels are present, indicating monetization via ads.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the main page; contact likely on other pages.
  5. Site uses Bitrix CMS and includes legacy IE compatibility meta tags.
  6. No DNSSEC and no visible security headers reduce security posture.
  7. Domain is old and consistent with business claims, indicating legitimacy.
  8. Content is safe and targeted at general and military-interested audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Bitrix CMS platform, using legacy compatibility meta tags and standard JavaScript libraries. It integrates multiple analytics and advertising services such as Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, and Atrk tracking. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. The HTML structure is valid but includes some legacy elements. Hosting details are limited to registrar information, with no explicit hosting provider identified. The site would benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved SEO and accessibility practices to enhance user experience and search engine visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.