Security report for floss.fund
FLOSS/fund · Technology · N/a
Medium risk. 14 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.
54/100
Risk levelMedium
FLOSS/fund is a recently established non-profit initiative founded in 2023, dedicated to providing up to $1 million annually to support free and open source software projects globally. The website clearly communicates its mission and offers an application portal for projects seeking funding. The initiative is positioned as a niche funder within the open source ecosystem, supported by a parent company, Zerodha, and partnered with FOSS United Foundation. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTTPS, Google Fonts, and Cloudflare DNS services, delivering a good user experience with responsive design and clear navigation. However, it lacks key compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and does not provide contact information or security incident channels, which limits transparency and user trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protection, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 posture
- 2/ 100 · Critical
- GDPR posture
- 35/ 100 · High
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
Indicative only: based on publicly visible signals, not a certification or legal assessment. NIS2 signals relate to Article 21 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555; GDPR signals to Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive.
Priority findings
14 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
- Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
- CAPEC-98
- RFC 7208
- RFC 6376
- RFC 9989
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(k): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(k): Network security
- NIST SP 800-177r1
- High
No SPF record found
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
- RFC 7208
- NIS2 21(2)(e)
- IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(k): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(k): Network security
- NIST SP 800-177r1
- Critical
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
- High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
- CWE-1021
- OWASP A06:2025
- CAPEC-103
- ASVS V3.4.6
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends X-Frame-Options: deny
- RFC 7034
- High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
- ASVS V3.4.3
- OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
- High
GDPR compliance
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Google APIs
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching floss.fund
This scan found 34 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Risk score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
- Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
- Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
- Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
- Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels to improve transparency and responsiveness.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- FLOSS/fund
- Description
- FLOSS/fund is dedicated to supporting critical, impactful, and valuable Free/Libre and Open Source projects globally by providing up to $1 million per year to support developers and communities that create and maintain projects, big and small.
- Key services
- Grant funding up to $1 million per year for free and open source software projects, Application portal for projects seeking funding, Information and blog resources about the initiative
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Rubik), Cloudflare DNS
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 75/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics and tracking
- Tracking level
- minimal
- Privacy compliance
- poor
Advertising
- Transparency
- poor
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- moderate
Key observations
- Website is a dedicated funding platform for free and open source software projects.
- No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
- No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided on the main page.
- Uses Cloudflare DNS and Google Fonts for performance and styling.
- No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
- No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
- Domain is newly registered with privacy protection, consistent with a new non-profit initiative.
- Partner ecosystem includes FOSS United Foundation.
- Website content is professional and well structured with clear navigation.
- No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR and IETF Datatracker (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
Retrieved 2026-10-24
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with floss.fund. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
Loading reviews…