Skip to main content

Security report for florencehc.com

Florence · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Florence Healthcare operates a specialized SaaS platform designed to enable always-on, remote workflows for clinical trials. Their platform streamlines site document management and administration, linking sponsors, clinical sites, and CROs with AI-augmented automation to expedite trial startup, reduce risk, and save costs through digitization and remote monitoring. The company targets clinical trial stakeholders seeking efficient and compliant trial operations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the Avada theme and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Crazy Egg, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS usage and some privacy controls, but lacks explicit security headers and public security policies. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the professional web presence suggests operational business activity. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and credible but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching florencehc.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
80
Email security
90
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Florence Healthcare positions itself as an innovative player in the healthcare technology sector, focusing on clinical trial workflow digitization. Their B2B SaaS model serves sponsors, sites, and CROs, leveraging AI to automate and streamline trial operations. The company appears medium-sized, founded in 2015, with a consistent brand presence and professional content. Their marketing ecosystem includes retargeting and analytics tools, indicating active customer engagement strategies. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a notable anomaly. No parent or subsidiary relationships were identified. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its AI-powered platform and focus on reducing trial startup delays and audit risks.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates privacy consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security or incident response policies were found, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies prominently on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including a security.txt file.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Florence
Description
Activate always-on, remote workflows for clinical trials. Streamline site document and administration and link sponsors, sites and CROs. Florence powers shared workflows and AI-augmented automation across sites and sponsors. Expedite startup: No Silos, no paper, no delays. Reduce risk: Be inspection and audit ready; anytime. Save millions with digitization and remote monitoring.
Key services
Remote workflows for clinical trials, Site document and administration streamlining, Linking sponsors, sites, and CROs, AI-augmented automation, Digitization and remote monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), jQuery, Toolset Blocks, UberMenu, Yoast SEO Premium, WordPress, MediaElement.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Consent management scripts present (Cookiebot, Optanon categories)
  • Google Analytics configured with IP anonymization

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Crazy Egg, LinkedIn Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Crazy Egg, AdRoll
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare SaaS platform for clinical trial workflow management.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual and warrants caution.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used with some privacy controls.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme and several plugins.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  9. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, supported by plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium and Toolset Blocks. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing technologies including Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, Crazy Egg, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site shows good SEO optimization and mobile responsiveness. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. However, no hosting provider details were identified, and no advanced performance optimization techniques were evident. Technical debt appears manageable but could be reduced by consolidating scripts and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with florencehc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review florencehc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.