Skip to main content

Security report for flock.io

FLock · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR compliance and 3 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

FLock.io is a technology-focused platform aiming to provide decentralized, privacy-preserving solutions for artificial intelligence through federated machine learning integrated with blockchain technology. The website presents a professional and modern interface targeting developers, AI researchers, and enterprises interested in advanced AI training and deployment. The platform offers live AI models and training capabilities, positioning itself as a niche player in decentralized AI innovation. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with UI components from Ant Design. Hosting includes Supabase for media content. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good SEO practices. However, accessibility features are basic, and some security best practices like security headers are missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. No contact or incident response information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better transparency and policy disclosures. The overall risk assessment suggests a legitimate technology project with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, publishing contact and incident response details, and improving WHOIS transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 posture
2/ 100 · Critical
GDPR posture
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

Indicative only: based on publicly visible signals, not a certification or legal assessment. NIS2 signals relate to Article 21 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555; GDPR signals to Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR compliance

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. NIS2 compliance

    NIS2 expects organisations in scope to show basic security hygiene. These public signals are what an auditor or customer sees first.

    • High

      No information security framework found

      NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

      What to do: Implement and document information security policies and procedures

      • NIS2 21(2)(a)
      • IR 2024/2690 1.1: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 1.1: Policy on the security of network and information systems
      • NIST PL-1: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PL-1: Policy and Procedures

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flock.io

This scan found 34 issues across 7 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Risk score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FLock.io operates in the emerging field of decentralized AI and federated learning, leveraging blockchain technology to enhance privacy and security. Its business model focuses on providing a platform for AI model training and deployment without centralized data sharing, appealing to privacy-conscious organizations and developers. The presence of live models and training portals indicates active service offerings. The company targets a specialized market segment with technical expertise, positioning itself as an innovator in privacy-preserving AI. The lack of detailed company information and public WHOIS data suggests a small or startup entity focused on technology development rather than broad commercial presence. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity level of FLock.io is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis, but the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file limits transparency and trust. Overall, while the platform shows awareness of security basics, it requires enhancements in policy disclosures, header implementation, and incident response mechanisms to reach higher maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish clear contact information and establish incident response channels for security issues.
  4. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data transparency or provide justification for privacy protection to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FLock
Description
FLock.io aims to build a decentralised privacy-preserving solution for Artificial Intelligence.
Key services
Federated machine learning platform, Blockchain integration for AI, Live AI models hosting, Training AI models on platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Ant Design, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy compliance
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. Content is focused on decentralized AI and federated learning
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No advertising or tracking networks detected except Google Tag Manager
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, with UI components from Ant Design, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting includes Supabase for video content delivery, suggesting use of cloud services for scalability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks some security best practices such as security headers and explicit privacy-related pages. Technical debt appears low given the modern frameworks, but the absence of certain compliance and security features represents an area for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures.

Retrieved 2026-10-24

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flock.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

Loading reviews…

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.