Skip to main content

Security report for flip.to

Flipto · Hospitality · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flip.to is a hospitality-focused SaaS platform that helps hotels, resorts, vacation rentals, and destination marketers increase direct bookings and build trusted brand connections through an advocacy marketing platform. The company positions itself as a trusted partner in the hospitality industry with a medium-sized business profile and a consistent brand presence. The website is professionally designed with good content quality, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, it uses modern technologies including Hugo static site generation, Bootstrap, AngularJS, and Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for form security. The site is hosted likely behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and SSL configuration. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and captcha-protected forms, but lacks explicit security policies and some security headers. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, though no cookie consent mechanism was detected. Contact information is readily available via multiple forms and phone numbers. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and privacy mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flip.to

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flip.to operates in the hospitality marketing sector, offering a SaaS advocacy platform that leverages guest journeys to increase bookings and brand reach. Its target customers include hotels, resorts, vacation rentals, and destination marketing organizations. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with a focus on direct marketing and guest advocacy. The company maintains a partner ecosystem and provides demos and contact channels to engage prospects. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized company with a solid market position and growth orientation. The presence of partner signup forms and demo requests suggests active business development and customer acquisition strategies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on all forms to prevent automated abuse. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and adding recommended headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flipto
Description
Flip.to is the most trusted way to earn new guests. Increase direct bookings, build trusted brand connections and extend your reach to travelers across the world with the advocacy platform for hotels.
Key services
Guest advocacy platform, Direct booking increase, Brand connection building, Marketing reach extension
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo, Bootstrap 5.3.1, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, Typekit Fonts, JSON-LD structured data
Frameworks
AngularJS (ng-app, ng-controller usage)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Form validation and error handling

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Multiple interactive forms with captcha protection
  3. Strong focus on hospitality industry marketing solutions
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Contact information prominently available via modals
  6. Privacy and terms policies are clearly linked and comprehensive
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite privacy policy presence
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, ensuring fast load times and good performance. It uses Bootstrap 5.3.1 for responsive design and AngularJS for dynamic UI components. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit, and Cloudflare Turnstile captcha is integrated for bot protection on forms. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but present, with some ARIA roles and labels. The site is mobile optimized and uses preloading for fonts and images to improve performance. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and well-executed with minor opportunities for enhanced accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flip.to. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flip.to.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.