Fletcher Group is a UK-based company specializing in the operation and management of Offshore Platform Supply Vessels, serving the energy sector with a modern fleet and over 300 employees. Their website demonstrates a professional digital presence with clear business descriptions, client testimonials, and multiple industry certifications, positioning them as a reputable service provider in offshore logistics and vessel management. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security measures include HTTPS, CSRF protection, reCAPTCHA integration, and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. The WHOIS data is notably missing, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the professional appearance and content of the website. Overall, the site scores well in content quality and security posture but should address domain registration transparency and enhance security policy disclosures.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
52
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75
Not counted
Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention fletchershipping.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for fletchershipping.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The Fletcher Group operates in the energy and transportation sectors, providing offshore vessel management and logistics services. Their business model focuses on fleet operation and chartering, targeting energy companies requiring offshore support. The company maintains strong industry relationships, evidenced by a broad client base including major energy firms and multiple certifications. Their digital presence supports marketing and client engagement through social media and multimedia content. The absence of WHOIS data is a potential risk factor but does not currently undermine their market position. Strategic partnerships and accreditations enhance their credibility and competitive advantage.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, CSRF tokens on forms, Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation, and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, the lack of visible security policies, incident response information, and security headers reduces transparency and may impact trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The integration of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with explicit policy disclosures and enhanced HTTP security headers.
Recommendations
Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact details for security issues.
Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
Enhance accessibility features and provide more comprehensive data retention and privacy disclosures.
Contact details published on the site
Registration number
SC546089
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Fletcher Group
Description
Fletcher Group is a privately-owned group of companies operating and managing a modern fleet of Offshore Platform Supply Vessels, supporting offshore drilling and production campaigns with a fleet of 15 vessels and over 300 employees.
Key services
Offshore Platform Supply Vessels operation and management, Supply logistics, Tailored construction activities, Subsea project support, Chartering services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, Colorbox, Owl Carousel, FlexNav, reCAPTCHA v3, CookieHub
Frameworks
Yii Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
CSRF tokens in forms
Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration
Cookie consent mechanism
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
ShareThis
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
Strong presence of certifications and client testimonials
Modern web technologies and frameworks used
Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms
Contact form secured with CSRF tokens and reCAPTCHA
WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
No explicit security or incident response policies found on site
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and Yii Framework on the backend. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, along with Facebook SDK and ShareThis for social media engagement. The site uses reCAPTCHA v3 for spam prevention and CookieHub for cookie consent management. Performance is moderate with multimedia content such as videos and carousels. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility could be improved. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with fletchershipping.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fletchershipping.com.