Skip to main content

Security report for fleetcor.eu

Fleetcor Deutschland GmbH · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fleetcor Deutschland GmbH operates a professional website offering modern fleet management solutions tailored for German and European companies. The company provides a range of services including fuel cards, charging cards, telematics, and digital fleet management tools. The website positions Fleetcor as an authorized Shell partner with extensive acceptance networks across Europe, targeting businesses of all sizes. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging Next.js and React frameworks, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools with a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and bot protection, though some security headers could be enhanced. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fleetcor.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fleetcor.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fleetcor.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fleetcor holds a strong market position as a key player in fleet payment and management services in Europe, especially Germany. Their business model focuses on B2B services, offering flexible product combinations and centralized digital management platforms. The company benefits from partnerships with major fuel and charging networks, including Shell, and provides value-added services like breakdown assistance and digital logbooks. The presence of customer portals and apps indicates a mature digital ecosystem. Fleetcor's growth is supported by extensive service coverage and integration with leading energy providers, positioning it competitively in the energy and transportation sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS, reCAPTCHA integration, and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were detected in the HTML content. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing security audits to mitigate risks. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, indicating a potential compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for business operations but could be strengthened with enhanced header policies and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Disclose incident response procedures and security contact channels to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide detailed data retention policies to align with GDPR and NIS2 requirements.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fleetcor Deutschland GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fleetcor Deutschland GmbH
Description
Optimieren Sie Ihre Flotte mit Tankkarten, Ladekarten und weiteren maßgeschneiderten Services von Fleetcor. Unsere Lösungen für Zahlungsabwicklung und Flottenmanagement helfen Ihnen, Kosten zu senken und die Effizienz zu steigern.
Key services
Tankkarten (fuel cards), Ladekarten (charging cards), Pannenservice (breakdown service), Digitales Fahrtenbuch (digital logbook), Fleetcor App for station finding and route planning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Google reCAPTCHA v3, Microsoft Clarity, Taboola, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Hotjar, Convertexperiments
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Taboola
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Marketo, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Marketo, Convertexperiments
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting fleet management customers in Germany and Europe.
  3. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools are used, with cookie consent implemented.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented in footer.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (Next.js, React).
  7. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
  8. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing platforms such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Marketo, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and layouts. Hosting details are not explicit, but the use of CDN and external asset hosting suggests a scalable infrastructure. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security header implementation. The technical stack supports a robust user experience for B2B clients.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fleetcor.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fleetcor.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.