Skip to main content

Security report for flaxcasino.se

Hospitality · Sweden

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website flaxcasino.se appears to be an online casino platform targeting Swedish users, as indicated by the domain and business sector. However, the actual website content is inaccessible due to a Cloudflare security challenge page requiring human verification before access. This limits the ability to analyze the site's content, policies, and business details. The domain is registered with a Swedish registrar, Abion AB, with no privacy protection, which aligns with the business location and type. The domain age is relatively recent, consistent with a newer online gambling business. Technically, the site uses Cloudflare for security and protection, including the Turnstile captcha service. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible, nor is there any contact information or social media presence on the accessible page. Security headers and best practices cannot be fully assessed due to the blocking mechanism. Overall, the site shows minimal accessible content and poor SEO and user experience at this stage.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flaxcasino.se

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Flaxcasino.se operates in the hospitality sector, specifically online gambling. The business model likely revolves around providing casino games and betting services to adult users in Sweden. The market position and competitive advantages cannot be determined from the blocked content. The lack of visible contact or policy information reduces transparency and trust. The domain registration is consistent and public, which supports legitimacy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the accessible data. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible. The use of Cloudflare indicates an emphasis on security and performance, but the user experience is hindered by the challenge page.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's security services, including a Turnstile captcha challenge to mitigate automated access and potential attacks. This is a positive security measure. However, no other security headers or policies are visible due to the blocking. The SSL configuration cannot be fully assessed but is likely present given Cloudflare's involvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are detected in the accessible content. Incident response and security policy information are absent. The overall security posture is moderate but cannot be fully evaluated due to limited access.

Recommendations

  1. Provide accessible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Publish clear contact information including support and incident response channels.
  3. Implement and expose standard security headers to enhance protection and security posture.
  4. Improve website content accessibility by reducing reliance on aggressive WAF blocking for legitimate users.
  5. Enhance SEO and user experience by providing meaningful content beyond security challenges.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. The HTML content is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile captcha verifying the user is human before accessing the site. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Key services
online casino gaming
Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare security challenge (WAF)
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies
  3. No contact information or business details on the accessible page
  4. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Cloudflare challenge
  5. No forms or data collection fields visible
  6. No social media or external business links found
  7. WHOIS data is public and consistent with domain and business location
  8. Website likely an online casino targeting Swedish adult users
  9. Content and SEO quality is poor due to blocking and minimal content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is protected by Cloudflare, using their Turnstile captcha for bot mitigation. The domain uses Cloudflare DNS servers but does not have DNSSEC enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No CMS or other frameworks are detected from the accessible content. The site currently serves a minimal HTML page for security verification, limiting performance and SEO evaluation. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be assessed due to the blocking page. The technical infrastructure prioritizes security but at the cost of user accessibility and content visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flaxcasino.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flaxcasino.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.