Skip to main content

Security report for flavoursoflivonia.com

Hospitality · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flavors of Livonia is a regional culinary tourism website focused on promoting the food heritage and cultural experiences of the historical Livonia region, covering Estonia and Latvia. The platform provides curated culinary routes, listings of local food producers, and information on traditional recipes and food heritage. The target audience includes tourists and culinary enthusiasts interested in exploring regional cuisine and culture. The business operates as a niche tourism promotion entity with a small-scale footprint and a focus on cultural preservation. Technically, the website uses a combination of jQuery, social media SDKs (Facebook and Twitter), Google Fonts, and various JavaScript libraries for UI and parallax effects. The site is mobile-optimized with a moderate performance profile. However, no explicit CMS or hosting provider information is evident. SEO and accessibility are basic but functional. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes a CSRF token, but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. The WHOIS data indicates a stable domain registration with no privacy protection, consistent with the website's age and purpose. Overall, the site is professionally designed and serves its niche well but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security hardening, and clearer contact and policy disclosures to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flavoursoflivonia.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a cultural and culinary tourism promoter for the Livonia region, leveraging historical and regional food traditions to attract tourists. Its competitive advantage lies in curated culinary routes and partnerships with regional food producers and tourism organizations. The business model is informational and promotional, likely funded by regional development programs (e.g., Interreg) and partnerships. The target customers are tourists interested in authentic regional experiences. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple regional tourism and food organizations, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth potential depends on expanding digital presence and improving user engagement through richer content and interactive features.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and a CSRF token is present, indicating some attention to security. However, the absence of security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), lack of privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response contact reduce the overall security maturity. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site uses third-party social media SDKs which should be regularly reviewed for vulnerabilities. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness is not evident. Overall, the site should prioritize publishing privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security issues.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add visible contact information including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and SDKs to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website promotes culinary tourism and cultural heritage related to the historical Livonia region, covering Estonia and Latvia. It offers information about local food producers, culinary routes, traditional recipes, and regional food heritage.
Key services
Listing of food producers and providers, Custom culinary route creation, Information on food heritage and recipes, Tourism route guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.4, Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets, Google Fonts, Retina.js, Parallax.js, Bootstrap modal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL)
  • CSRF token present in meta tag

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter Widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional culinary tourism platform focused on Estonia and Latvia.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found despite cookie consent commented out.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Uses common third-party social media SDKs (Facebook, Twitter) for social integration.
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is not privacy protected.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
  9. Website content is in Estonian with multilingual navigation available.
  10. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery 2.1.4, Facebook and Twitter SDKs, Google Fonts, and various UI enhancement libraries like parallax.js and retina.js. The site is mobile responsive and has a moderate performance profile. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, which may limit scalability and maintainability. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting details are not disclosed. The site could benefit from modernization with newer frameworks, improved SEO metadata, and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flavoursoflivonia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flavoursoflivonia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.