Skip to main content

Security report for flaktgroup.com

FläktGroup · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FläktGroup is a company specializing in air technology systems aimed at maintaining clean and healthy indoor air for improved living and professional environments. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting businesses and professionals in need of air quality solutions. The company appears to be a large entity within the energy sector, offering B2B technology and manufacturing services related to HVAC and air systems. Technically, the website employs modern technologies such as React and .NET, integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, and is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content supports legitimacy. Privacy compliance is moderate, with a cookie banner present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages detected. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flaktgroup.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FläktGroup operates in the air technology and energy sector, providing specialized systems for indoor air quality. Their business model focuses on B2B manufacturing and technology solutions, targeting professional and commercial clients. The company leverages partnerships with analytics and marketing platforms like Google and HubSpot, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in customer engagement and compliance. The domain's WHOIS data absence may indicate privacy protection or recent registration, warranting further verification. The company’s market position appears established, with a consistent brand and quality content supporting their industry presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture by enforcing HTTPS and implementing a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency and readiness communication. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file further reduces security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, Strict-Transport-Security) to improve protection against common attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve user engagement and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FläktGroup
Description
Air technology systems from FläktGroup maintain clean and healthy indoor air for a better quality living and professional environments.
Key services
Air technology systems, Indoor air quality solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, React (implied by react-libs.css)
Frameworks
.NET (dotnet_sdk_1.4.22 meta tag)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner present with granular controls
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service explicitly found in provided content
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or registry issue
  6. Use of modern technologies including React and .NET
  7. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management
  8. No WAF or security challenge detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including React for frontend components and .NET for backend services, as indicated by meta tags and CSS chunk files. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent management, reflecting a mature approach to data collection and privacy compliance. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flaktgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flaktgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.