Skip to main content

Security report for fla.cz

Františkovy Lázně AQUAFORUM a.s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Františkovy Lázně AQUAFORUM a.s. is a medium-sized hospitality company based in the Czech Republic, specializing in spa medical care, accommodation, gastronomy, and aquapark services. Founded in 2014, it is one of the largest employers in the Františkovy Lázně spa town, offering stable employment and quality wellness services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business information and contact details. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Google Analytics and Modernizr, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness and warrants further investigation. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fla.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
90
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fla.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fla.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector focused on spa and wellness services, leveraging local natural healing resources. It targets general consumers seeking spa treatments and employment candidates. The business model centers on service provision in spa hotels and aquapark facilities. Market positioning is strong locally as a major employer and service provider. Partnerships with Pawlik Aquaforum and the web development firm IntoIT indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The company emphasizes stable employment and quality care, suggesting a sustainable revenue model based on spa services and hospitality. Growth potential exists through expanding offered positions and maintaining high service standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the frontend. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Františkovy Lázně AQUAFORUM a.s.
VAT number
CZ699005631
Registration number
10989391
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Františkovy Lázně AQUAFORUM a.s.
Description
Společnost Františkovy Lázně AQUAFORUM a.s. vznikla 01.08.2014 a patří mezi největší zaměstnavatele ve Františkových Lázních. Hlavním zaměřením je poskytování kvalitní lázeňské péče, gastronomie, ubytování v komfortních lázeňských hotelech a vodních radovánek v Aquaforu, největším a nejkrásnějším akvaparku českých lázní. Společnost je stabilní a silná, nabízí celoroční zaměstnání a klade důraz na kvalitní zaměstnance.
Key services
Spa medical care, Gastronomy, Accommodation in spa hotels, Aquapark services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Modernizr, Font Awesome, jQuery Colorbox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Seznam retargeting
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Czech language focused on spa and hospitality services.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite EU GDPR relevance.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  6. Use of standard analytics and retargeting scripts.
  7. Contact info is clearly presented in footer with phone, email, and address.
  8. No social media links found on the site.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries.
  10. No forms with data collection fields detected except a mobile menu select form.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Google Analytics for tracking, Modernizr for feature detection, and Font Awesome for icons. It loads CSS and JS assets efficiently and is mobile responsive. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. SEO is basic with canonical link and meta viewport tags present. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fla.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fla.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.