Skip to main content

Security report for fitt.co

Fitt.co · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fitt.co is a US-based unified holding company focused on the health and wellness industry. Founded in 2015 and led by experienced operators, it creates, acquires, and invests in next-generation health brands. The company operates multiple branded subsidiaries including media, recruiting, consulting, capital investment, and event platforms, positioning itself as a distribution-first platform embedded in the wellness ecosystem. The website targets executives, founders, operators, and investors seeking knowledge, connections, and resources in health and wellness. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Yoast SEO, and uses Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized and professionally designed, with good SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, and uses an outdated jQuery version which poses risks. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy found but no cookie consent mechanism or explicit GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is limited to a web form with no direct emails or phone numbers publicly listed. Overall, the site is credible and professional but could improve security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fitt.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fitt.co holds a strong market position as an operator-led platform in the health and wellness sector, leveraging 15+ years of experience. Its business model combines investment, acquisition, and creation of brands with services spanning media, recruiting, consulting, capital, and events. The company targets industry leaders and decision-makers, providing curated content, research insights, and networking opportunities. The presence of multiple branded subsidiaries and partnerships indicates a diversified portfolio and ecosystem approach. The domain age and WHOIS data support legitimacy. The company’s digital presence is consistent and professional, supporting growth and influence in the wellness industry.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form handling but lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing risks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.2) is a notable vulnerability that could be exploited. No public security or incident response policies are found, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery to the latest secure version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve transparency.
  5. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including dedicated security contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fitt.co
Description
Fitt is a unified holding company creating, acquiring, and investing in the next generation of health brands. They provide executives with knowledge, connections, and resources to win in the health and wellness industry.
Key services
Research-driven insights (Fitt Insider), Curated health and wellness content (Wellworthy), Network-driven recruiting (Fitt Talent), Health innovation events (Health Innovation Lab), Consulting services (Fitt Consulting Group), Capital investment (Fitt Capital)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Contact Form 7, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Typekit Fonts, jQuery 1.11.2
Frameworks
Yoast SEO Premium
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Contact Form 7 with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO Premium
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Clear business focus on health and wellness industry
  3. Multiple branded subsidiaries and partner sites
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  6. Use of outdated jQuery version is a security concern
  7. No visible security or incident response policies
  8. No DNSSEC enabled on domain
  9. Good SEO practices with Yoast SEO plugin
  10. Mobile optimized and responsive design
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for SEO optimization and Contact Form 7 for form handling. It uses Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight Tag for analytics and tracking. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile responsive and has a professional design. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy based on registrar and nameservers. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The use of outdated jQuery is a technical debt and security risk. No advanced accessibility features are evident beyond basic HTML semantics. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fitt.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fitt.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.