Skip to main content

Security report for firstdata.com

Fiserv · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fiserv is a leading enterprise in the financial services sector, specializing in small business merchant services and enterprise payment processing solutions. The website merchants.fiserv.com serves as a platform to showcase their payment processing offerings and enterprise solutions, targeting businesses that require robust payment infrastructure. The company holds a strong market position as a leader in payment services, supported by a professional and consistent web presence. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including Angular framework components and integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Adobe Helix RUM for performance monitoring. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good design and user experience standards. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous script loading but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies in the provided content, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain and subdomain structure align with legitimate enterprise usage, though WHOIS data for the subdomain is not available as expected. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, implementing security headers, and publishing clear security and incident response policies to bolster trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching firstdata.com

This scan found 11 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention firstdata.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23,610
Employees
7
Customers
9,033
Third parties
14,570
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-04-30 · 271 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for firstdata.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –gcss-p1im.firstdata.com2026-04-30
  • –gcss-p1im.firstdata.com2026-04-20
  • –gcss-p1im.firstdata.com2026-04-20
  • –fdc-fedsso-int.firstdata.com2026-04-12
  • –fdc-fedsso-int.firstdata.com2026-01-05

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fiserv operates in the finance sector with a focus on payment processing and merchant services. Their business model revolves around providing payment infrastructure and solutions to small businesses and enterprises. The website content and technical setup indicate a mature digital presence with integration of advanced analytics and performance monitoring tools. The company targets business customers requiring payment solutions, positioning itself as a market leader. The absence of explicit contact information and privacy policies on the analyzed page suggests these may be located elsewhere or require better visibility. The partnership ecosystem includes integration with various analytics and tracking services. The company’s operations appear stable and professional, with consistent branding and a clear value proposition in the payments industry.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of asynchronous script loading to improve performance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security effectiveness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contact information, indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. The site uses third-party analytics scripts which should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to mitigate supply chain security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fiserv
Description
As the leader in small business merchant services and enterprise solutions for payments, Fiserv creates new experiences to take your business to the next level.
Key services
Small business merchant services, Enterprise payment solutions, Payment processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM, Stormcaster.js (custom script), 6sc.co analytics script
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of async scripts to improve load performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Helix RUM, 6sc.co analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), 6sc.co tracking
Marketing tools
Adobe Helix RUM
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a subdomain of fiserv.com, a known financial services company.
  2. Content is business-focused on payment processing and merchant services.
  3. No WHOIS data for subdomain, which is normal.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML snippet.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts present.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Website uses modern technologies and appears mobile optimized.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies, including Angular framework components and Adobe Experience Manager CMS, as inferred from client library paths. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager, Adobe Helix RUM, and 6sc.co scripts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses asynchronous script loading to enhance performance. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta descriptions and Open Graph tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for an enterprise-level financial services company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 85/100Low16 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firstdata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firstdata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.