Skip to main content

Security report for firnasshuman.com

Firnas Shuman · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Firnas Shuman is a consulting and technical services provider specializing in power generation and transmission infrastructure across Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. The company has significant experience, having contributed to over 10,000 MW of power generation capacity in more than twenty-five countries. The website reflects a professional consulting business with a focus on renewable energy and turnkey resource measurement campaigns. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, hosted by NameCheap, Inc. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, and no direct contact information is visible, which may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching firnasshuman.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention firnasshuman.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
48
Employees
1
Customers
5
Third parties
42
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-09-22 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for firnasshuman.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –odoo.firnasshuman.com2025-09-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the energy sector, targeting organizations involved in power infrastructure development in emerging markets. Its consulting model focuses on renewable energy and resource measurement, positioning it as a niche expert with a broad geographic reach. The company appears small but experienced, with a domain age consistent with its founding year. The lack of visible contact details and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and compliance. The use of WordPress and common plugins indicates a standard digital presence without bespoke technical infrastructure. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer lock status, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No security policy or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency in case of security events. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enable DNSSEC, implement security headers, and publish security and incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact details, including a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Firnas Shuman
Description
Firnas Shuman provides consulting and technical services to those who plan, build, own, and operate power generation and transmission infrastructure in Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia. They have been involved in over 10,000 MW of power generation capacity in over twenty five countries.
Key services
Renewable Energy Consulting Services, Turnkey Resource Measurement Campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Divi Builder, Ultimate Social Media Plus, Mailchimp for WP, Revolution Slider, FontAwesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress Stats
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or metadata.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the visible content or metadata.
  3. No security policy or incident response information published.
  4. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and themes but lacks advanced security headers.
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage content provided.
  6. Social media links not explicitly found in the provided content.
  7. SEO metadata and Open Graph tags are well implemented.
  8. JSON-LD structured data present describing the organization and webpage.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, Divi Builder, and Mailchimp integration, indicating a mature but standard CMS-based infrastructure. Hosting is provided by NameCheap, Inc., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with good SEO metadata and structured data. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or bespoke backend technologies. The technical setup is stable but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firnasshuman.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firnasshuman.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.