Skip to main content

Security report for firesafe.no

Firesafe · Energy · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Firesafe is a Norwegian company specializing in comprehensive fire safety solutions, offering services such as fire consulting, fire protection, alarm systems, extinguishing systems, and training. With over 40 years of experience and ISO 9001 certification, Firesafe positions itself as a trusted total provider in the fire safety sector, targeting small to large businesses across Norway. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern technologies including Vue.js and Shopify integration for e-commerce capabilities. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes detailed privacy and cookie policies with a robust consent mechanism, demonstrating good compliance with GDPR requirements. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, Firesafe presents a professional and trustworthy online presence aligned with its business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
63/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching firesafe.no

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
63
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Firesafe operates in the energy sector focusing on fire safety services and products. Its business model combines consulting, installation, maintenance, and training services, supported by a digital platform that includes e-commerce capabilities via Shopify. The company leverages partnerships such as Teamtailor for recruitment and uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement. The presence of ISO 9001 certification and detailed cookie consent mechanisms indicate a commitment to quality and compliance. The target market includes a broad range of Norwegian businesses requiring fire safety solutions. The company maintains active social media channels to enhance brand visibility and customer interaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, and forms require explicit privacy acceptance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are not detected. The use of third-party scripts is extensive but appears managed with consent. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found in the analyzed content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing formal security policies and improving HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Firesafe
Registration number
958 249 799
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Firesafe
Description
Firesafe er totalleverandør innen brannsikring. Vi bidrar til å redde liv og verdier gjennom vårt arbeid for et tryggere og mer brannsikkert samfunn.
Key services
Brannrådgivning, Brannsikring, Service, Brannalarm, Slokkesystemer, Kurs og øvelser
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Vue.js, Axios, Shopify Buy Button SDK, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress, The SEO Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS, Shopify embedded for e-commerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required privacy acceptance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google, Microsoft, Shopify
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Hotjar, Facebook Ads, Microsoft Advertising
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie declarations
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress, Vue.js)
  5. Presence of ISO 9001 certification indicates quality management commitment
  6. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond privacy and cookie policies
  7. No terms of service or incident response information found
  8. Social media presence is active and linked
  9. Use of third-party marketing and analytics tools with user consent
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Vue.js, Axios, and Shopify Buy Button SDK for e-commerce functionality. SEO is supported by The SEO Framework plugin, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts and stylesheets, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile optimization and accessibility features are well implemented. The site uses Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in caching and resource optimization. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firesafe.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firesafe.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.