Skip to main content

Security report for fire-eater.com

Fire Eater A/S · Energy · Denmark

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fire Eater A/S is a specialized provider of advanced fire protection solutions, focusing on Inergen fire suppression systems designed for critical environments such as data centers, energy facilities, and heritage buildings. The company holds a strong market position with over 10,000 installations worldwide and a network of certified partners for global service delivery. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with strong SEO, multilingual support, and performance optimizations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA on forms, and privacy compliance, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are absent. Overall, the site demonstrates professionalism and trustworthiness appropriate for its industry and audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fire-eater.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
82
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fire Eater operates primarily in the energy sector, targeting businesses requiring reliable fire suppression without operational downtime. Their business model is B2B, offering both products and services including installation and maintenance. The company leverages partnerships for global reach and emphasizes sustainability and safety in its offerings. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer education, with clear navigation and comprehensive product information. The presence of a partner portal indicates a structured partner ecosystem. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the scale of installations suggests a medium-sized enterprise with established market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses security best practices such as deferred script loading and reCAPTCHA v3 on contact forms to mitigate spam and abuse. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Matomo and Hotjar indicates moderate user tracking balanced with privacy considerations. Security headers are partially implemented but could be enhanced with explicit X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options headers. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and contact channels.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly audit and update all third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency on data retention policies related to analytics and user data.
  5. Consider adding visible certifications or compliance badges to strengthen trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fire Eater A/S
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fire Eater A/S
Description
Fire Eater provides advanced fire protection solutions including Inergen fire suppression systems designed for critical environments, ensuring fire extinguishment without damage or downtime.
Key services
Inergen fire suppression systems, Installation and servicing, Consultancy and tailored fire protection plans, Customer support and training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts (Questrial), WP Rocket (performance optimization), Popup Builder plugin, Contact Form 7, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Matomo Analytics, Hotjar
Frameworks
Enfold Theme, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Lazy loading and deferred scripts for performance
  • Use of nonce and integrity attributes in scripts (implied)
  • Contact form with reCAPTCHA v3 integration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Hotjar
Marketing tools
ActiveCampaign subscription forms, Popup Builder
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on fire protection solutions.
  3. Multiple language support via WPML plugin.
  4. Strong SEO and performance optimization using WP Rocket.
  5. Contact form secured with reCAPTCHA v3.
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No visible certifications or compliance badges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and Avia framework, leveraging modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. Performance is optimized with WP Rocket for lazy loading, script deferral, and CSS minification. Multilingual support is provided by WPML, enabling English, Danish, and Norwegian languages. Analytics are handled via Matomo, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature approach to user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit but the site uses HTTPS and appears performant and stable.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fire-eater.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fire-eater.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.