Skip to main content

Security report for fintokei.com

Fintokei · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fintokei is a proprietary trading platform focused on providing traders access to funded accounts on the cTrader platform, allowing users to trade with capital and withdraw up to 95% of profits. The company targets active traders seeking to elevate their trading skills and benefit from regular payouts. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with active social media channels and a clear business proposition in the finance sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, including Google Tag Manager, Smartlook, and Bloomreach Exponea, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR consent banner. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness, warranting further verification. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and business-focused but could enhance transparency and contact availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

    • High

      Weak DKIM Key

      DKIM selector 'google' uses 528-bit key

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fintokei.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
57
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fintokei operates in the niche prop trading market, leveraging partnerships such as with Purple Trading to enhance its service offering. The business model revolves around providing traders with capital and sharing profits, targeting a specialized audience of active traders. The company appears relatively new, founded in 2022, and maintains a small but professional online presence. Revenue streams likely include fees or profit shares from funded accounts. The use of affiliate tracking suggests an active marketing and partnership ecosystem. The website content and social media presence support a credible market position, though the lack of explicit contact details and WHOIS transparency could impact trust. Strategic growth could focus on expanding contact channels and publishing terms of service and security policies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, reflecting a good baseline security posture. Multiple third-party scripts are used, including analytics and marketing tools, which increases the attack surface but are common in modern websites. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly present and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. Incident response and security policies are not publicly disclosed, which is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in header implementation and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service and incident response policy to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Provide explicit company contact information including support emails and phone numbers on the website.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fintokei
Description
Experience prop trading on the cTrader platform with Fintokei. Enjoy regular payouts, withdraw up to 95% of profits, and elevate your trading skills today!
Key services
Prop trading on cTrader platform, Regular payouts, Profit withdrawal up to 95%
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, GSAP, Slick Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll), SwiperJS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Smartlook, Bloomreach Exponea
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook, Bloomreach Exponea
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Smartlook, Bloomreach Exponea
Marketing tools
Intercom chat, Cookiebot consent management, Bloomreach Exponea
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional design and consistent branding
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some legitimacy questions
  6. Multiple third-party scripts and tracking services used
  7. Affiliate tracking implemented via cookies
  8. No terms of service page detected
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, GSAP for animations, Slick Carousel, AOS for scroll animations, and SwiperJS for sliders. Google Tag Manager is extensively used for analytics and marketing tags, alongside Cookiebot for consent management and Smartlook for session recording. Bloomreach Exponea is used for customer experience optimization and experimentation. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and APIs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well implemented.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fintokei.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fintokei.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.