Skip to main content

Security report for fintechhub.lt

FINTECH HUB LT Association · Finance · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FINTECH HUB LT Association is a Lithuanian-based organization dedicated to uniting and supporting licensed fintech companies within Lithuania and the European Economic Area. The association focuses on advocacy, promoting high standards of risk management and compliance, and positioning Lithuania as a global fintech hub. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, with clear mission statements, goals, and leadership profiles linked to credible LinkedIn accounts. The association is a member of several reputable councils and organizations, enhancing its industry standing. Technically, the website is built on the EditMySite platform, utilizing standard web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and TermsFeed cookie consent scripts. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and employs HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism, indicating compliance with GDPR requirements. However, some technical improvements could be made, such as updating legacy libraries and implementing additional security headers. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good baseline practices with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible advanced security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration analysis, but the overall trustworthiness is supported by the professional presentation and linked social profiles. Overall, FINTECH HUB LT Association's website is a credible and well-maintained platform serving its niche audience effectively. Strategic enhancements in security policies, technical modernization, and transparency would further strengthen its digital maturity and trust posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fintechhub.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association occupies a strategic position within Lithuania's fintech ecosystem, serving as a collective voice and support network for licensed fintech companies. Its business model revolves around membership, advocacy, and sector promotion rather than direct commercial services. The presence of multiple board members with active LinkedIn profiles and partnerships with recognized councils indicates a robust partnership ecosystem. The association's focus on compliance and risk management aligns with regulatory trends in fintech, positioning it well for growth and influence. Revenue streams likely derive from membership fees and sponsorships. The website content and structure reflect a clear understanding of its target audience and sector needs.

Security posture

The website's security posture is adequate for an informational association site. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. The use of an outdated jQuery version could pose vulnerabilities if exploited. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities was found. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could improve transparency and incident handling. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FINTECH HUB LT Association
Description
The Association unites and supports licensed Fintech companies in Lithuania and the EEA, protecting their interests, creating favorable conditions for operations, promoting high standards of risk management and compliance, and representing Lithuania as a global Fintech center.
Key services
Representation and advocacy, Promotion of risk management and compliance standards, Networking and partnership facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, TermsFeed Cookie Consent, Weebly/EditMySite platform scripts, Google Analytics (ga.js), Snowplow Analytics
Platforms
EditMySite (Weebly-like site builder)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; no registrar or domain dates extracted.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and has cookie consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Contact email info@fintechhub.lt is provided in footer.
  6. Site built on EditMySite platform with standard scripts and analytics.
  7. Board members and staff have LinkedIn profiles linked, enhancing trust.
  8. The site represents a Lithuanian fintech industry association with clear mission and goals.
  9. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found in the content.
  10. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on the EditMySite platform, which provides a managed CMS environment. The tech stack includes legacy jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics (ga.js), and Snowplow Analytics for tracking. The site uses TermsFeed for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile-optimized. However, the use of older JavaScript libraries suggests some technical debt. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site could benefit from modernization efforts to improve security and performance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fintechhub.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fintechhub.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.