Skip to main content

Security report for finley.agency

Finley Agency · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finley Agency is a Czech Republic based marketing agency specializing in comprehensive marketing services including brand creation, insight and planning, video production, public relations, event management, and graphic design. The agency has been operating for approximately 7 years with over 195 projects completed and offers 24/7 support. Their target audience includes personal brands, startups, SMEs, corporations, and government entities. The website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, though some security headers are missing and no cookie consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions or privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy with good content quality and technical implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finley.agency

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency positions itself as a full-service marketing partner with a strong portfolio of clients across various sectors including personal brands, startups, and government. Their business model is service-based, focusing on long-term cooperation and comprehensive project management. Certifications such as Prince2 and memberships in industry associations enhance credibility. The agency uses a mix of digital marketing tools and analytics to support client campaigns. Growth indicators include a diverse client base and ongoing projects. The partnership ecosystem includes industry associations and preferred voucher programs. Strategic observations suggest a stable small-sized agency with a focus on quality and client satisfaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is partial with GDPR documentation available but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by implementing additional headers, cookie consent, and explicit security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility including verified company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finley Agency
Description
Finley Agency is a marketing agency with 7 years on the market, offering services including insight and planning, brand creation, marketing campaigns, video production, PR, event management, and graphic design. They have completed over 195 projects and provide 24/7 support.
Key services
Insight and planning, Brand creation, Marketing campaigns, Video production, Public Relations, Event management, Graphic design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Contact Form 7, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leady.com
Marketing tools
Leady.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WAF or blocking detected
  3. Professional marketing agency with diverse portfolio
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  5. Privacy and terms documents available as PDFs
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to TLD restrictions or privacy
  9. Good branding consistency and trust signals
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated for tracking user behavior. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve load times. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional marketing agency website with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 47/100 +2High35 findingsView report
  2. 45/100High36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finley.agency. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finley.agency.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.