Skip to main content

Security report for finform.ch

Finform AG · Finance · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finform AG is a Swiss company specializing in digitalized compliance services tailored for financial institutions, focusing on client onboarding and compliance back-office support. Their unique real-time onboarding process, supported by expert intervention for complex cases, positions them as an innovative service provider in the finance sector. The website reflects a professional and trustworthy image, supported by client testimonials and partnerships with recognized financial entities such as PostFinance AG and Yuh Ltd. Technically, the site is built on the Contao CMS with modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates security measures like hCaptcha and HTTPS. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the absence of a terms of service page and explicit security or incident response policies suggests areas for improvement. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, and the WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finform.ch

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Finform AG operates in the finance sector, providing compliance and onboarding solutions primarily to banks and financial institutions. Their business model combines software and service offerings, emphasizing efficiency, legal certainty, and cost reduction. The company leverages partnerships and client testimonials to strengthen market position. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a focused target audience. The use of modern CMS and integration of analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and Feedbucket reflect a digitally mature infrastructure. The lack of publicly disclosed certifications or security policies may limit trust among highly regulated clients, suggesting potential growth areas in compliance transparency.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration and integrates hCaptcha to protect its contact form from spam and abuse. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, representing a potential enhancement area. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact channels limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adding explicit security headers, a vulnerability disclosure policy, and incident response information to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a terms of service page to enhance legal completeness and user trust.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Finform AG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finform AG
Description
Finform AG offers digitalized compliance services for financial institutions, specializing in client onboarding solutions and temporary support for compliance back-office activities. Their services include a real-time client onboarding process with expert handling of complex cases, aiming to reduce time and costs while ensuring legal certainty.
Key services
Client onboarding as a service, Compliance back-office support, Real-time onboarding process, API integration for account and product opening
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, slick carousel, hCaptcha, Google Tag Manager, Feedbucket
Frameworks
Contao Open Source CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • hCaptcha integration on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Feedbucket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern CMS (Contao) and standard web technologies.
  2. Strong focus on compliance and digital onboarding for financial institutions.
  3. Includes client testimonials and partner logos enhancing trust.
  4. Contact form uses hCaptcha for spam protection.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and slick carousel for UI elements. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and Feedbucket for marketing automation. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred execution to improve user experience. The contact form uses hCaptcha for bot protection, indicating attention to security. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented, with opportunities to enhance security headers and formalize security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finform.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finform.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.