Skip to main content

Security report for fineza.lv

FINEZA - grāmatvedības pakalpojumi un konsultācijas · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FINEZA is a Latvian-based professional accounting and business consulting service provider targeting companies and self-employed individuals. Their website presents a clear and professional offering of accounting services including bookkeeping, financial audits, company formation, and registration changes. The business positions itself as a trusted partner helping clients achieve their goals by managing their accounting needs efficiently. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, with modern web technologies and SEO optimizations in place. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA implemented, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. Overall, the site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and user-friendly, reflecting a credible small business. However, the lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis. No suspicious or malicious indicators were found.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fineza.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FINEZA operates in the finance sector providing essential accounting and consulting services primarily to Latvian businesses and self-employed persons. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on B2B and B2C segments with a niche local market presence. The company emphasizes personalized service and responsibility for their work. The website content and structured data indicate a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and clear service descriptions. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company leverages modern digital tools for marketing and client engagement but lacks visible certifications or trust badges. Growth potential appears steady given the professional presentation and service range.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate ensuring encrypted communications. It uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse and implements a cookie consent banner for GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, explicit policies, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include explicit contact information such as company email and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FINEZA - grāmatvedības pakalpojumi un konsultācijas
Description
Profesionāli grāmatvedības pakalpojumi Uzņēmumiem un Pašnodarbinātām personām ar Fineza. Sniedzam arī konsultācijas dažādos saistītos jautājumos jūsu biznesam.
Key services
Grāmatvedības pakalpojumi, Grāmatvedības atjaunošana, Uzņēmuma dibināšana, Izmaiņu reģistrēšana uzņēmumu reģistrā, Finanšu pārbaude, Konsultācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Astra Theme, Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust analysis.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main page.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in provided content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. Uses modern WordPress theme and plugins with SEO optimization.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. No analytics scripts explicitly detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. It loads Google Fonts and jQuery libraries and uses reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with Rank Math plugin. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of heavy technical debt or outdated technologies. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence suitable for a small business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fineza.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fineza.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.