Skip to main content

Security report for finchecker.eu

Finchecker · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finchecker is a Latvia-based company specializing in AML and KYC compliance solutions tailored for financial institutions and related sectors. Their offerings include AML screening, identity verification, transaction monitoring, and ongoing compliance monitoring, delivered via web and API platforms. The company positions itself as a flexible, all-in-one compliance provider with strong integration support and competitive pricing. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and relevant content for its target audience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, with HTTPS enforced and no visible security vulnerabilities. However, it lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and published security policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and legitimate, supporting a high trust level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finchecker.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Finchecker operates in the finance sector, targeting banks, investment firms, forex brokers, payment companies, insurance, and iGaming industries. Their business model is B2B SaaS, focusing on automating compliance processes through API and web solutions. The company leverages AI and machine learning for data aggregation and compliance automation. Market positioning emphasizes flexibility, comprehensive data coverage, and ease of integration. Partnerships include a development partner (g-2.eu). Growth indicators include active participation in industry events and a growing client base. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data. Use of secure forms with anti-bot hidden fields is noted. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could impact trust and compliance. Tracking scripts are present without a visible cookie consent banner, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the website content or WHOIS data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking and data collection.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy policies and cookie practices to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Finchecker
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finchecker
Description
Finchecker offers a customizable AML Compliance solution that is advanced yet user-friendly. They provide web-based and API solutions for full automation of AML and KYC compliance processes.
Key services
AML screening, Identity verification, ID verification, Transaction monitoring, PEP & Sanctions Screening, Ongoing Monitoring, ID/Liveness, KYB (Know Your Business), Adverse Media Screening
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google Tag Manager, Custom JavaScript, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with anti-bot hidden field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Lfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Lfeeder tracker
Marketing tools
Mailchimp (newsletter subscription)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on AML/KYC compliance solutions with clear business positioning.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy page found, but terms and conditions page likely includes privacy info.
  4. No visible cookie consent banner despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in footer and contact page.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  7. Use of modern analytics and tracking technologies.
  8. Good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, with custom JavaScript and CSS for styling. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the domain is registered via a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS detected, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing cookie consent mechanisms. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finchecker.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finchecker.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.