Skip to main content

Security report for finance360.eu

SIA Finance 360 · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Finance 360 operates as a Latvian financial services company offering integrated financial solutions aimed at clients and partners seeking comprehensive financial support. The company emphasizes fast, secure, and risk-mitigated services with fair pricing and collaboration among market participants. The website content is primarily in Latvian and presents basic corporate information including the company registration number, but lacks detailed privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. Technically, the website uses older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.9.1 and minimal modern web technologies, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by updating libraries and implementing security headers. No analytics or tracking tools are evident, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the site presents a basic but functional online presence with moderate trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finance360.eu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
50
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention finance360.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for finance360.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a small-sized financial services provider in Latvia, targeting clients needing a broad range of financial solutions under one roof. The business model focuses on uniting market participants to offer advantageous terms and secure financial services. The website content and structure suggest a modest digital maturity with limited marketing or analytics integration. The absence of detailed contact information and policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly referenced. The company registration number is clearly displayed, supporting legitimacy. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not disclosed.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. The use of outdated jQuery 1.9.1 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent or privacy policies. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is found. The site does not appear to collect extensive user data or use tracking technologies, reducing exposure but also limiting user insights. Overall, the security posture requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options).
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  4. Add visible contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Conduct a security audit and implement vulnerability disclosure and incident response procedures.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
SIA Finance 360
Registration number
40103444030
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Finance 360
Description
Finance 360 offers integrated financial services aimed at providing clients and partners with comprehensive financial solutions under one company, focusing on fast, secure, and risk-limited financial support. They emphasize fair and reasonable pricing and aim to meet daily client needs by uniting market participants.
Key services
Financial services, Client material support, Market participant collaboration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jquery.formstyler.min.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries explicitly detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Latvian with some Russian language options.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  3. Contact information is minimal and primarily via contact page link.
  4. No email addresses or phone numbers explicitly listed on main page.
  5. Uses outdated jQuery version 1.9.1 which may pose security risks.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security mechanisms detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Basic SEO and accessibility features present but minimal.
  9. Company registration number displayed in footer indicating legal entity.
  10. No social media links with URLs; only icons with empty hrefs (#).
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and uses jQuery 1.9.1 and jquery.formstyler.min.js for UI enhancements. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features and shows only basic mobile optimization. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. The site does not use analytics or marketing tools, indicating low digital marketing maturity. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and missing security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finance360.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finance360.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.