Skip to main content

Security report for finance-monthly.com

Finance Monthly · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finance Monthly is a specialized online media platform delivering news, analysis, and insights focused on personal finance, money management, and investing. The site targets everyday consumers seeking to improve their financial literacy and investment strategies. It operates primarily as a content publisher with revenue streams from advertising and affiliate marketing, positioning itself as a niche player in the finance media sector. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and a consistent brand identity, supported by active social media channels and contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Oxygen Builder framework, leveraging modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Moosend for email marketing. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. The site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration but lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which could be improved for better privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices like HTTPS enforcement and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy indicates room for enhancement. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the active and professional nature of the website mitigates this risk somewhat. Overall, Finance Monthly presents a credible and useful resource for personal finance information, but it should address privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finance-monthly.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Finance Monthly occupies a niche in the personal finance media market, targeting consumers interested in money management and investing. Its competitive advantage lies in providing curated news, expert insights, and practical advice tailored to everyday users. The business model relies on content publishing supported by advertising and affiliate partnerships, including links to legal and financial services. The presence of a parent company, Universal Media 365, suggests a broader media network backing. Growth indicators include active content updates, social media engagement, and diversified content categories such as fintech, crypto, and net worth profiles. Strategic partnerships with marketing and affiliate platforms enhance revenue potential. The company appears focused on expanding its digital footprint and audience reach within the finance information sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no obvious exposure of sensitive information. However, the lack of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may lead to GDPR compliance gaps. The use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts introduces potential privacy risks that should be managed carefully. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the site would benefit from implementing additional security controls and formal policies to enhance its security culture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner and update privacy policies to explicitly address GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response policy to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and advertising partners to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors and meet regulatory standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finance Monthly
Description
Finance Monthly is a a go-to resource tailored for everyday consumers seeking clarity and guidance in personal finance, money management, and smart investing.
Key services
News articles, Commentary, In-depth financial analysis, Advertising opportunities, Newsletter
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Oxygen Builder, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Moosend Tracking, MGID Ads, Google Adsense
Frameworks
Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
MGID, Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Moosend
Marketing tools
Moosend email marketing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for an active .com domain
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and tracking tools
  4. Contact information and social media presence are clearly provided
  5. No explicit or adult content detected
  6. Advertising and affiliate marketing are present but transparently integrated
  7. No advanced security headers detected, room for improvement
  8. No cookie consent banner found, which may impact GDPR compliance
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Oxygen Builder framework, which provides flexible design capabilities. It integrates Google Fonts for typography and Google Tag Manager for analytics management. Email marketing is handled via Moosend, and advertising is served through MGID and Google Adsense networks. The site loads scripts asynchronously to optimize performance, and images are appropriately sized for responsive design. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic accessibility. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy implementations could be modernized to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finance-monthly.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finance-monthly.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.