Skip to main content

Security report for filmovakritika.cz

Sdružení české filmové kritiky, z.s. · Media · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website filmovakritika.cz represents the Sdružení české filmové kritiky, a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to film criticism, awards, and cultural promotion within the Czech film industry. It serves a niche audience of film critics, cinephiles, and industry professionals by providing reviews, award information, premieres, and critic profiles. The site is well-structured, primarily in Czech, and demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality. The domain is well-established since 2010, supporting the organization's credibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, with modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js and jQuery. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for user tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices but lacks some accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. No forms collect sensitive user data except a basic search form. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. External links include many gambling-related domains embedded in hidden elements, which may be unrelated or potentially spammy, warranting further review. Overall, the website is a legitimate cultural media platform with moderate technical maturity and security posture. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure would enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filmovakritika.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Filmovakritika.cz operates as a small, essential non-profit entity within the Czech media sector, focusing on film criticism and awards. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche specialization and established presence since 2010. The business model revolves around cultural promotion and information dissemination rather than direct revenue generation. The target audience includes Czech film critics, cultural institutions, and film enthusiasts. Partnerships with entities like Innogy and KVIFF TV indicate a supportive ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular content updates and event coverage. The presence of gambling-related external links may be incidental or require monitoring. The organization maintains a focused market position with limited diversification.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, protecting data in transit. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate privacy risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Review and remove or isolate suspicious external links embedded in hidden elements to prevent potential SEO or security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sdružení české filmové kritiky, z.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sdružení české filmové kritiky, z.s.
Description
Website dedicated to Czech film criticism awards, reviews, premieres, and related film industry news and information.
Key services
Film reviews, Film awards information, Film premieres, Critics profiles, Event coverage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper.js, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Site Kit for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a cultural non-profit focused on Czech film criticism and awards.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well structured.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. No contact phone numbers found; only email and physical address provided.
  5. External links include many gambling-related domains embedded in hidden divs, which may be unrelated or spam injections.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and Elementor builder.
  7. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK used for tracking.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No forms with sensitive data collection detected except a search form.
  10. No explicit adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder, enabling flexible and responsive design. It uses common JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components and animations. Google Fonts and Font Awesome provide consistent typography and icons. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive breakpoints and uses external CSS and JS assets efficiently. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filmovakritika.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filmovakritika.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.