Skip to main content

Security report for fillauer.com

Fillauer · Healthcare · United States

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fillauer is a medium-sized healthcare company specializing in prosthetic and orthotic devices, serving both healthcare professionals and patients. The company has an established market presence since 1998 and operates an e-commerce platform built on WordPress and WooCommerce. The website employs modern technologies including jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. While the site is functional and professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections in place, but the absence of security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is safe and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fillauer.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fillauer operates in the healthcare sector focusing on prosthetic and orthotic solutions, targeting healthcare providers and patients. The business model includes direct sales and support services, leveraging an e-commerce platform for product distribution. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding, positioning it as a reputable player in its niche. However, the lack of visible certifications or trust badges on the website may limit perceived credibility. The use of Google Tag Manager suggests some marketing and analytics capabilities, though privacy compliance is minimal. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status locks preventing unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The use of standard WordPress plugins requires regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. Overall, security is functional but could be significantly enhanced.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security posture.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details if applicable.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fillauer
Description
Fillauer is a company specializing in prosthetic and orthotic products and services, providing solutions for limb loss and limb difference.
Key services
Prosthetic devices, Orthotic devices, Patient support, Product distribution
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WooCommerce, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WooCommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based e-commerce site focused on prosthetic and orthotic products.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages in the provided content.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and standard plugins like WooCommerce and Google Tag Manager.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No data protection officer contact or incident response contact information found.
  7. No certifications or trust badges explicitly found in the provided content.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, using jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components, and Font Awesome for icons. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing. Hosting appears to be via Amazon Registrar, likely AWS infrastructure. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No advanced frameworks beyond WordPress are detected. The site would benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fillauer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fillauer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.