Skip to main content

Security report for filipesmedia.cz

FILIPES MEDIA s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FILIPES MEDIA s.r.o. operates a professional performance marketing agency website focused on PPC, SEO, social media advertising, e-commerce solutions, and video production. The company positions itself as a certified partner with over 7 years of experience, targeting businesses seeking effective online marketing services. The website is well-structured, with comprehensive service descriptions and clear contact information, supporting a strong market presence in the Czech Republic. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, enhanced by WP Rocket for performance optimization, and integrates major analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some advanced security headers and explicit security policies are absent. Overall, the domain WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is typical and justified for this business type. The website is trustworthy, professional, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filipesmedia.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector, specializing in digital marketing services including PPC campaigns, social media content and ads, SEO, email marketing, graphic design, and e-shop development on the Shoptet platform. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting small to medium-sized enterprises in the Czech market. The presence of certifications and a specialized team of 15 experts indicates a competitive advantage and a focus on quality delivery. The website content and structured data reflect a mature digital presence with multilingual support (Czech and Slovak). The company leverages partnerships such as Facebook and Google for advertising and analytics, indicating a well-integrated marketing ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner that supports GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which could enhance trust and preparedness. The use of reputable third-party scripts is noted, but continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities is recommended. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good for a small marketing agency website.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining data protection measures and incident response procedures.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance incident response readiness by providing explicit contact channels for security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FILIPES MEDIA s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FILIPES MEDIA s.r.o.
Description
Nastavíme PPC reklamy tak, aby na váš web přivedly relevantní potenciální zákazníky za cenu, která se vám vyplatí.
Key services
PPC and analytics, Social media content, Social media advertising, SEO, E-mailing, Graphic design, E-shop creation on Shoptet, Video production
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
WP Rocket
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional and targeted at marketing clients
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant
  5. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found
  7. Contact information is clearly presented and verified
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder, supported by WP Rocket for caching and performance optimization. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, enabling comprehensive user behavior tracking and marketing effectiveness measurement. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for organization and location. Performance is fast due to caching and lazy loading techniques. No hosting provider information was directly identified from the content. The technical stack is appropriate for a small to medium-sized digital marketing agency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filipesmedia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filipesmedia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.