Skip to main content

Security report for filesmonster.tv

FilesMonster.TV · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FilesMonster.TV operates as an adult entertainment platform specializing in streaming and aggregating premium pornographic video content across a wide range of categories. The site targets an adults-only audience and monetizes primarily through advertising and affiliate partnerships with other adult sites. The platform offers a basic user interface with categorized content and search functionality but lacks advanced user engagement features or comprehensive business contact information. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.8.2, Google Analytics for tracking, and Shareaholic for social sharing, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity but with room for modernization and security improvements. Security posture is limited, with no visible security headers or incident response contacts, and the use of outdated libraries poses potential vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic privacy policy and cookie notice but no explicit GDPR compliance or consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional but exhibits several gaps in security, privacy, and business transparency that could impact trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filesmonster.tv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself within the adult media sector, focusing on niche content aggregation and streaming. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of adult categories and affiliate partnerships with multiple external adult sites, enhancing content variety and monetization potential. The business model relies on advertising and affiliate marketing rather than direct sales or subscriptions. The absence of clear company information, contact details, or certifications limits credibility and may hinder growth opportunities. The partnership ecosystem is extensive but primarily consists of similar adult content sites, indicating a focused but narrow market presence. Growth indicators are not evident from the site content, and the platform appears to operate as a small-scale adult content aggregator.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. The site uses HTTPS as implied by canonical URLs but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.2) introduces potential vulnerabilities to known exploits. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents effectively. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack explicit consent mechanisms or GDPR compliance indicators. These gaps expose the site to potential security risks and regulatory non-compliance, which could impact business operations and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security@ or abuse@ email addresses to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by implementing explicit cookie consent mechanisms and updating privacy policies to reflect GDPR and other relevant regulations.
  5. Improve business transparency by providing verifiable contact details, terms of service, and certifications to build user trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FilesMonster.TV
Description
FilesMonster.TV is an adult entertainment website offering a premium porn tube service with a wide variety of adult video categories and content.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Adult content categorization, Affiliate linking to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.2, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Shareaholic
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical URL)
  • No inline sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Shareaholic
Marketing tools
Shareaholic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming platform with extensive categories
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers for business or support
  3. Privacy and DMCA policies are present but basic
  4. No terms of service or security policies found
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks
  6. No visible security headers or incident response contacts
  7. Affiliate linking to multiple external adult sites
  8. No social media links detected
  9. Content is clearly adult and NSFW
  10. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website's technical infrastructure is based on legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.8.2, which is outdated and potentially vulnerable. It integrates Google Analytics for user tracking and Shareaholic for social sharing, indicating basic marketing and analytics capabilities. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS identification, suggesting a custom or minimalistic backend. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. The absence of advanced accessibility features and modern responsive design elements indicates technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical stack supports basic functionality but requires updates to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filesmonster.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filesmonster.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.