Fiare Media Tools operates as a specialized provider of digital tools aimed at news publishing businesses, offering custom content management systems, layout automation, and integrated newsroom solutions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting media companies seeking to digitize and automate their publishing workflows. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie consent, and uses HTTPS to secure communications. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking explicit security headers and formal privacy policies. Overall, the site is functional and well-designed but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention fiaremediatools.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for fiaremediatools.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company positions itself in the media technology sector, focusing on B2B services for newsrooms and publishers. Its business model revolves around providing specialized software tools to streamline digital publishing processes. The presence of LinkedIn and Facebook social links suggests engagement with professional and social audiences. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information limits full business credibility assessment. Market positioning appears niche and focused, with potential for growth in digital media automation. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.
Security posture
Security maturity is moderate; HTTPS is enforced ensuring encrypted data transmission. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating some privacy compliance efforts. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit privacy and terms of service pages represent compliance and security gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which may impact readiness for security events. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture requires improvements in transparency, policy documentation, and technical safeguards.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
Provide clear and accessible contact information including support and security contacts to improve business credibility and incident response readiness.
Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate commitment to security best practices.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Fiare Media Tools
Description
We help you digitize your news publishing business with our specialised tools such as custom CMS, layout automation and integrated solutions.
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, LinkedIn, Facebook SDK, Open Sans font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Cookie consent mechanism implemented
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Pixel, Facebook Pixel, Lfeeder Tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
No WHOIS registration data found, indicating possible domain registration issues
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected
Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot
No contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage content
Social media links to LinkedIn and Facebook are present
Website uses HTTPS and modern fonts and scripts
No security headers detected in provided data
Website content is focused on media tools and newsroom automation
No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts, indicating attention to performance and privacy. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with unicode subsets for broad language support. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. However, no CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with fiaremediatools.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fiaremediatools.com.