Skip to main content

Security report for fiagents.lv

SIA “FIAGENTS” · Finance · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fiagents is a Latvian small business specializing in outsourced accounting and financial consulting services. The company offers bookkeeping, financial consultations, and tax advisory services primarily targeting local entrepreneurs and businesses. With over 16 years of experience and a client base exceeding 70, Fiagents positions itself as a reliable partner for financial management needs. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, providing clear navigation and relevant business content. Technical infrastructure is modern but basic, with no advanced analytics or marketing tools detected. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, though lacking in security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy assessment, but the site content and business information appear consistent and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fiagents.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fiagents operates in the finance sector, focusing on outsourced accounting and consultancy. Its business model relies on providing comprehensive bookkeeping and advisory services to small and medium-sized enterprises in Latvia. The company emphasizes quality and responsibility in financial record-keeping and compliance. The website reflects a localized market approach with no evident international partnerships or subsidiaries. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in its experience and client trust. Revenue streams likely come from service fees for accounting and consulting. The absence of extensive marketing or tracking tools suggests a conservative digital strategy. The company maintains clear contact information and branding, supporting credibility in its niche market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The site does not display any known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies raises compliance concerns, particularly regarding GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, formal policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security governance.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and monitoring tools with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior and improve services.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “FIAGENTS”
Registration number
40103191032
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “FIAGENTS”
Description
Provides outsourced accounting services, financial and tax consultations, and management accounting support for businesses.
Key services
Grāmatvedības pakalpojumi, Konsultācijas finanšu jautājumos, Konsultācijas nodokļu jautājumos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.15, Elementor, Astra Theme, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in footer and contact page links.
  5. No security policy or incident response information is provided.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and Elementor scripts.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  8. No external advertising or marketing tools detected.
  9. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional.
  10. Technical stack is modern but basic, relying on WordPress and Elementor.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.15 using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a widely adopted and supported CMS platform. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Fonts, standard for modern websites. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile responsiveness is good, supported by Astra and Elementor’s responsive design features. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA and semantic HTML elements but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing integrations, reflecting a simple digital footprint. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fiagents.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fiagents.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.