Skip to main content

Security report for fhrs.lu

Fondation des Hôpitaux Robert Schuman · Healthcare · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fondation des Hôpitaux Robert Schuman (FHRS) is a Luxembourg-based non-profit organization dedicated to advancing healthcare through funding infrastructure, equipment, research, training, and humanization of care. The foundation collaborates closely with the Hôpitaux Robert Schuman and other healthcare partners to support impactful projects that improve patient care and medical innovation. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear calls to action for donations, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and tracking tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is managed via EuroDNS nameservers, and the site enforces HTTPS with secure cookie settings. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. Security best practices are partially implemented, with room to enhance HTTP security headers and incident response transparency. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit security policy or incident response contact is published. The domain registration data aligns well with the website content, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the FHRS website represents a trustworthy and professional healthcare foundation with solid technical and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response disclosures would further strengthen its security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fhrs.lu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FHRS occupies a niche in the Luxembourg healthcare philanthropy sector, leveraging partnerships with major hospitals and healthcare services. Its business model relies on donations to fund healthcare projects, research, and training. The foundation targets donors, healthcare professionals, and the general public interested in supporting healthcare advancement. The website content and structure suggest a stable organization with a clear mission and consistent branding. The partnership ecosystem includes key healthcare institutions, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth indicators include active project showcases and donation campaigns. The foundation's operations appear focused on quality and impact rather than scale, consistent with a small-sized non-profit entity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and secure cookie attributes set. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating good data protection practices. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, balanced by privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Conduct regular security audits to ensure no vulnerable libraries or plugins are present and keep all software up to date.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Increase transparency around data retention policies and user tracking to further improve privacy compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fondation des Hôpitaux Robert Schuman
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondation des Hôpitaux Robert Schuman
Description
La Fondation Hôpitaux Robert Schuman est active dans le domaine de la santé au Luxembourg. Elle investit dans des projets d’infrastructures, équipements, innovation, recherche, formation et enseignement dans le secteur de la santé.
Key services
Funding medical equipment and infrastructure, Supporting medical research, Supporting healthcare team training, Promoting humanization of care
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Yoast SEO, React (partial usage), WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookie with SameSite=Lax
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in French with multilingual support.
  3. Strong focus on healthcare philanthropy and foundation activities.
  4. No visible security or privacy policy gaps, but incident response info is missing.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. Clear donation mechanisms and calls to action.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The hosting is managed through EuroDNS nameservers, indicating a professional domain registrar. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with responsive design for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and JS assets cached for efficiency. Some React components appear to be used for interactive elements. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and additional security headers to reduce technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and well-maintained, supporting the foundation's digital presence effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fhrs.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fhrs.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.