Skip to main content

Security report for fhcontent.com

FapHouse · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FapHouse is a recently launched adult entertainment platform specializing in streaming and downloading full-length pornographic videos, including VR content and live sex streaming. The website targets an adults-only audience and offers a broad range of services such as fanclubs, sex chat, and a large video library with premium producers and popular pornstars. The platform supports multiple languages and provides a cookie consent mechanism aligned with privacy regulations. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforcement and domain transfer protection, though DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is good with clear privacy and cookie policies, but no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are found. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but could improve security transparency and technical hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fhcontent.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FapHouse operates in the adult media sector, leveraging a subscription and content streaming business model. It competes in a crowded market by offering a large volume of premium and amateur content, VR options, and interactive services like live sex and sex chat. The platform's multi-language support and partnerships with related domains enhance its market reach. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions, pay-per-view, and affiliate marketing. The absence of detailed company contact information and certifications suggests a focus on user privacy and anonymity common in adult entertainment. The domain's recent registration aligns with the platform's launch, indicating a new entrant with ambitions for growth. Strategic partnerships with live streaming and chat services expand its ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and domain transfer lock. The cookie consent mechanism denies ad and analytics storage by default, reflecting privacy-conscious design. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing advanced security headers, and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved to meet higher compliance standards such as ISO 27001 or NIST frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and provide incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata for better user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FapHouse
Description
Watch full-length porn videos and XXX movies from premium producers on FapHouse. Download sex videos featuring the hottest pornstars and kinkiest models!
Key services
Streaming full-length porn videos, Downloading sex videos, VR content, Fanclubs and subscriptions, Live sex streaming, Sex chat services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Identity Services, Cloudflare DNS, Responsive design, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Custom JS frameworks (rspack bundler detected)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with denied ad and analytics storage by default
  • Domain locked with clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large adult content platform with extensive video library.
  2. Content is accessible without WAF or blocking.
  3. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit contact or security policy information found.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and Google services for analytics and identity.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure.
  8. No company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  9. Multiple related domains for partner and subsidiary services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager and Google Identity Services. It employs Cloudflare DNS and CDN services for performance and security. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with preconnect hints to key asset domains. The HTML structure is well-formed with proper meta tags for viewport and description. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and videos. The site uses multiple external domains for content delivery and partner services, indicating a distributed infrastructure. Technical debt appears low but could improve with enhanced security headers and DNSSEC.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fhcontent.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fhcontent.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.