Skip to main content

Security report for fgirot.se

FörsäkringsGirot · Finance · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FörsäkringsGirot is a well-established Swedish company specializing in pension and insurance administration services, targeting HR, finance, and payroll professionals. With over 30 years of experience and a client base including major corporations such as Volvo, Husqvarna, and Coca-Cola, the company offers comprehensive and flexible pension administration solutions. Their website reflects a professional and trustworthy brand, supported by ISO 27001 certification and strong GDPR compliance. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools like Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and CookieYes for consent management, ensuring good performance, accessibility, and SEO optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and a mature security management framework, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site demonstrates a high level of professionalism, security, and compliance, making it a reliable platform for its business audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fgirot.se

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fgirot.se, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fgirot.se right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the Swedish pension administration sector, leveraging its long history and trusted client relationships. Its business model focuses on B2B services, providing administrative support and consultancy to companies managing employee pensions and insurance. The presence of detailed client testimonials and case studies indicates a customer-centric approach and a focus on quality service delivery. The company’s use of certifications and compliance with GDPR enhances its competitive advantage. Marketing and analytics tools are used responsibly with clear consent mechanisms, reflecting a mature digital marketing strategy. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation focused on its core niche.

Security posture

FörsäkringsGirot exhibits a strong security posture, evidenced by its ISO 27001:2022 certification and use of HTTPS with secure cookie consent management. The integration of Google reCAPTCHA protects against automated abuse. While explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy are not detected, the overall security practices are robust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be improved. The company demonstrates good compliance with GDPR and data protection principles, reinforcing trustworthiness. The security score is high, but there is room for enhancement in header implementation and incident response transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts to improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Continue to monitor and improve cookie consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FörsäkringsGirot
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FörsäkringsGirot
Description
Vi har hjälpt 300 000 anställda till rätt tjänstepension sedan 1994. Låt oss hjälpa dig med din pensions- och försäkringsadministration.
Key services
Tjänstepensionsadministration, Löneväxlingskollen, Konsulttjänster, Pensions- och försäkringsadministration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery, Fancybox, CookieYes consent management
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Google Site Kit
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • ISO 27001 certification indicating strong security management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Analytics, Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with detailed consent management
  3. ISO 27001 certification indicates mature security posture
  4. Multiple trusted client testimonials enhance credibility
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform, utilizing a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google Tag Manager for marketing tag management, and CookieYes for cookie consent compliance. The site uses Bootstrap 4.3.1 for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site is well-structured with valid HTML and CSS, and SEO meta tags are properly implemented. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site uses multiple external domains for CDN, analytics, and social media integrations, all reputable and standard for such a business. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and secure user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fgirot.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fgirot.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.