Skip to main content

Security report for fez.lt

Klaipėdos Laisvoji Ekonominė Zona | Klaipėdos LEZ | FEZ.LT · Energy · Lithuania

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.fez.lt represents Klaipėdos Laisvoji Ekonominė Zona (Klaipėda Free Economic Zone), a regional economic zone authority focused on promoting investment and business development in Klaipėda, Lithuania. The site targets businesses and investors interested in free economic zone opportunities, offering services related to economic zone management and investment promotion. The business model centers on facilitating economic growth within the region by attracting and supporting enterprises. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing common frameworks and libraries such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and various plugins for enhanced user experience and functionality. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, indicating a secure connection. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, with SEO practices implemented via meta tags and structured data. However, accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, demonstrating awareness of privacy and security compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no visible privacy or terms of service policies were found, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment, but the website content and SSL usage suggest a legitimate business presence. Overall, the website is functional and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures, security headers, and visible contact information to improve trust and compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, adding security headers, and providing clear contact channels for incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fez.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Klaipėdos Laisvoji Ekonominė Zona operates as a regional economic zone authority in Lithuania, focusing on attracting investments and supporting businesses within the free economic zone. The organization leverages its strategic location and government backing to position itself as a key player in regional economic development. Its business model is service-oriented, providing infrastructure, regulatory facilitation, and promotional activities to investors and companies. The website indicates a medium-sized entity with a focus on the energy sector, although it may serve multiple industries within the zone. The presence of structured data and multilingual support suggests an intent to reach international investors. The lack of detailed business information and contact data on the website limits deeper competitive analysis but indicates a formal institutional presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. A cookie consent banner is implemented, indicating compliance with cookie regulations. However, the absence of visible HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security robustness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site uses several third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which may introduce privacy and security risks if not regularly audited. The lack of explicit privacy and security policies, as well as incident response contact information, suggests gaps in compliance and readiness. Overall, the security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header configurations and policy transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies prominently on the website.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klaipėdos Laisvoji Ekonominė Zona | Klaipėdos LEZ | FEZ.LT
Key services
Economic zone management, Investment promotion, Business support
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, RevSlider, Cookiebot, Photo Sphere Viewer, Owl Carousel, FancyBox, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  2. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  6. Website built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries.
  7. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts detected.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and various plugins such as RevSlider and Cookiebot for enhanced functionality. The site loads multiple external resources from reputable CDNs and tracking services. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data, aiding search engine visibility. Accessibility is basic, with standard HTML and CSS usage but no advanced ARIA roles or landmarks detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical infrastructure is adequate for the business purpose but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fez.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fez.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.