Skip to main content

Security report for feedtrail.com

Relias · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Relias is an enterprise-level healthcare technology company specializing in lifelong workforce enablement and quality improvement solutions. Their website focuses on delivering real-time data insights, patient feedback mechanisms, and prescriptive interventions to optimize healthcare quality. The company positions itself as a trusted provider in the healthcare sector with a comprehensive suite of services aimed at healthcare organizations. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Cookiebot for analytics, marketing, and compliance. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers could be more visible. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR considerations are evident. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professional presentation and consistent branding support its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedtrail.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
35
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention feedtrail.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for feedtrail.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Relias operates in the healthcare technology sector, targeting healthcare providers and organizations seeking to improve care quality. Their business model is primarily B2B SaaS and services focused on workforce enablement and quality improvement. The company leverages partnerships and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and conversion. Their market position is that of an established provider with a strong brand presence and comprehensive service offerings. The absence of direct contact information on the analyzed page suggests a focus on lead generation through forms and marketing automation. The company maintains active social media channels, enhancing brand visibility and trust. Growth indicators include the use of advanced analytics and marketing platforms, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations. However, explicit security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy are not clearly visible in the provided data and should be verified and implemented if missing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure policy represents an area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from enhanced transparency and additional security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify explicit security headers including X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools to ensure they do not introduce vulnerabilities or privacy risks.
  5. Enhance visibility of contact information for security and privacy inquiries to support compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Relias
Description
Lifelong Healthcare Workforce Enablement. Optimize care quality improvement through real-time data insights, patient feedback, and prescriptive interventions.
Key services
Healthcare quality improvement solutions, Real-time data insights, Patient feedback management, Prescriptive interventions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Bing Ads, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Abtasty, OptinMonster, Snowplow Analytics, Google Fonts, UserWay Accessibility Widget
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Snowplow Analytics, Abtasty
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Twitter Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Abtasty, Snowplow Analytics
Marketing tools
OptinMonster, Abtasty, Pardot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is focused on healthcare quality improvement solutions
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implementation
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, common for enterprise domains
  7. Social media presence is consistent with company branding
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a variety of modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot, and multiple marketing and analytics platforms. The site loads Google Fonts asynchronously and implements lazy loading for images, contributing to good performance. Accessibility features are present, including the UserWay accessibility widget. SEO is well-implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates consistent branding and professional design. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. Technical debt appears low, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedtrail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedtrail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.