Skip to main content

Security report for feedbackinfra.com

Feedback Infra · Energy · India

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feedback Infra is a large, India-based integrated infrastructure services company specializing in sectors such as energy, transportation, and real estate. The company offers a broad range of services including advisory, design, engineering, architecture, project management, and operations & maintenance. It maintains a strong market position as a leading infrastructure services provider with multiple subsidiaries and an international presence. The website reflects a professional business with clear branding and a focus on infrastructure development. Technically, the website uses a traditional tech stack with Bootstrap 3.3, jQuery, and Google services for analytics and search. While the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom-built solution. The site is functional with good navigation and content relevance. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, and there is no explicit HTTPS enforcement visible in the provided data. Google Analytics and Adsense are used, indicating moderate user tracking. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in security transparency. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is credible and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and technical modernization to strengthen trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedbackinfra.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Feedback Infra operates in the infrastructure sector with a focus on energy, transportation, and real estate services. Its business model centers on providing integrated infrastructure solutions including advisory, engineering, and project management. The company targets infrastructure developers, investors, and government agencies. It has a strong presence in India with subsidiaries in Indonesia, Nepal, and Dubai, indicating international expansion. The company leverages digital marketing through social media and Google services but lacks advanced privacy and security disclosures. The business appears stable and established with a clear market position and diversified service offerings.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but has notable gaps. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers reduces protection against common web attacks. No cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms are present, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. The lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies limits transparency and preparedness. However, no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The use of Google Analytics and Adsense indicates user tracking but without clear privacy controls. Overall, the site requires improvements in security best practices and compliance to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS site-wide with HSTS to ensure secure communications.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR compliance.
  4. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feedback Infra
Description
Feedback Infra is an integrated infrastructure services company offering services in sectors such as energy, transportation, realty, and social infrastructure. It provides advisory, design, engineering, architecture, project management, and operations & maintenance services. The company operates internationally with regional and international offices.
Key services
Advisory & Transactions, Design & Engineering, Architecture, Project Management, Operations & Maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3, jQuery 1.10.2, Google Analytics, Google Custom Search Engine, Owl Carousel, jQuery Flipster, jQuery Slimmenu
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS scripts for analytics and search

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Google Custom Search Engine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and structured content.
  2. No explicit cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone number.
  4. Social media presence is active on major platforms.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information published.
  7. Use of multiple JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and search.
  8. No CMS detected; appears to be a custom-built site using Bootstrap and jQuery.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy but stable technology stack including Bootstrap 3.3 and jQuery 1.10.2, supplemented by plugins like Owl Carousel and Flipster for UI components. Google Analytics and Custom Search Engine are integrated for analytics and search functionality. The site lacks a modern CMS and advanced SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but could benefit from modernization to improve speed, accessibility, and SEO. No hosting provider or CDN information was detected. Technical debt is moderate, with opportunities for upgrades to newer frameworks and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedbackinfra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedbackinfra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.