Skip to main content

Security report for feders.lv

Dr. Federa Vācijas-Latvijas Kardioloģijas Centrs · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dr. Federa Vācijas-Latvijas Kardioloģijas Centrs is a specialized healthcare provider focusing on cardiology and related medical services in Latvia, with strategic partnerships including the Charité German Heart Center. The clinic offers a comprehensive range of diagnostic and treatment services, supported by a professional website that reflects its healthcare focus and patient-oriented approach. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies and includes multilingual support and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is good with HTTPS and cookie consent, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the professional presentation and clear contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-positioned to serve its target audience with a trustworthy online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feders.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention feders.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for feders.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare sector, targeting patients requiring cardiology and specialized medical consultations. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on diagnostics, treatment, and outpatient care. The partnership with a renowned German heart center enhances its market position and credibility. The website links to multiple insurance and laboratory partners, indicating a robust ecosystem. The content and navigation are clear, supporting patient engagement and service discovery. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused niche in Latvia. The presence of VAT number and structured data adds to business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR principles. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be a gap for transparency. The use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts is managed with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers are not explicitly present, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a healthcare website but could be enhanced with additional policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy or certification information to reinforce trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dr. Federa Vācijas-Latvijas Kardioloģijas Centrs
VAT number
LV40203215002
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dr. Federa Vācijas-Latvijas Kardioloģijas Centrs
Description
Dr. Federa Vācijas-Latvijas Kardioloģijas Centrā nodrošina mūsdienīgu, augsti kvalificētu diagnostiku un ārstēšanu, balstītu uz Rietumu medicīnas standartiem, lai nodrošinātu precīzu un efektīvu pacientu aprūpi. Sadarbojas ar Charité Vācu Sirds centru sarežģītos gadījumos. Piedāvā plašu ārstniecības specialitāšu klāstu un pakalpojumus, tostarp diagnostiku, ārstniecību, dienas stacionāru un laboratoriju.
Key services
Diagnostika, Ārstniecība, Dienas stacionārs, Laboratorija, Kardiologa konsultācija, Pulmonologa konsultācija, Gastroenterologa konsultācija, Endokrinologa konsultācija, Neirologa konsultācija, Ģimenes ārsta konsultācija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 5, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes Consent, Cloudflare (implied by cookie __cf_bm)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • External links open in new tabs with noopener noreferrer
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to healthcare services.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  5. Multiple external trusted insurance and healthcare partner domains linked.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  9. No security policy or incident response information is published on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Bootstrap 5 and FontAwesome for UI components, with integration of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. CookieYes is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and suitable for the business needs, with opportunities to enhance security headers and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feders.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feders.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.