Skip to main content

Security report for fdc.works

Flying Digital Content · Media · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flying Digital Content is a professional digital content production company specializing in B2B video and photo services. Their offerings include subscription-based content delivery and large-scale projects such as TV commercials and music videos. The company positions itself as a reliable partner delivering high-quality content on demand, within budget, and on time. Technically, the website is built on modern platforms including Webflow CMS, Vimeo for video hosting, and uses advanced animation libraries like GSAP. The site is mobile-optimized, fast, and well-structured with clear navigation and professional design. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protected by privacy services, though some security headers and DNSSEC are not enabled. Privacy compliance is strong with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. However, no direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and suitable for its target B2B audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fdc.works

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector, focusing on digital content creation for businesses. Their business model includes monthly subscription plans and bespoke large projects, targeting clients needing video ads, social media content, and employer branding materials. The market position is that of a specialized, high-quality production house with a small team and recent establishment in 2023. They leverage partnerships such as Flying Bisons for powering their operations. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals including client testimonials and a professional portfolio. Their digital presence is supported by social media channels on Instagram, Vimeo, and LinkedIn, enhancing their market reach and credibility.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. Cookie consent is managed via Iubenda, indicating GDPR awareness. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency for security concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The security score is good but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Provide verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flying Digital Content
Description
Flying Digital Content offers high-quality video and photo content production services for B2B clients, including subscription plans and large-scale projects such as TV ads and commercials. They focus on delivering content on demand, within budget, and on time.
Key services
Video Production, Photo Shoot, Social Media Content, 2D/3D Animations, Strategy & Consulting, Copywriting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Vimeo Player, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow, GSAP
Platforms
Vimeo
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented via Iubenda

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Iubenda Cookie Consent
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible.
  2. Content is rich with multimedia and interactive elements.
  3. Strong focus on B2B video and photo content production.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and animation libraries.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with business profile.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging Vimeo for video content delivery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including GSAP for animations and jQuery for DOM manipulation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. The use of CDN for assets and Cloudflare DNS contributes to performance and reliability. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates some technical security gaps. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags and Open Graph data properly configured. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-implemented with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fdc.works. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fdc.works.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.