Skip to main content

Security report for fcservices.sk

FinCo Services, a.s. · Finance · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FinCo Services, a.s. is a Slovak financial services company specializing in financial intermediation and brokerage. Established originally in 2002 and evolving through strategic partnerships, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services including administrative support, legal services, marketing, e-learning training, and an advanced online information system for intermediaries. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise targeting financial professionals and clients in Slovakia, aiming to be a market leader in its segment. Technically, the website employs a jQuery-based tech stack with UI enhancements and animations, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though lacking some advanced HTTP security headers and incident response disclosures. Privacy compliance is strong with clear cookie consent mechanisms and comprehensive legal documentation. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the company's business objectives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fcservices.sk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a broker pool and financial intermediary service provider with a strong IT and legal support infrastructure. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a broad portfolio of financial products from reputable institutions, backed by a proprietary information system and online contract processing capabilities. The target market includes financial intermediaries and clients seeking reliable financial planning services in Slovakia. Partnerships with financial institutions and service providers like PROFIServis Group enhance its ecosystem. The business model focuses on supporting intermediaries with administrative, legal, and marketing services, enabling scalable growth. The company maintains transparency through published ethical codes, complaint procedures, and privacy policies, reinforcing its credibility in the finance sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, which protects domain integrity. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and GDPR compliant, indicating good privacy practices. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected, but continuous monitoring is recommended. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but can be improved by implementing additional security headers and publishing incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party JavaScript libraries and update them to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain transparency by updating privacy and cookie policies regularly and ensuring all legal documents are easily accessible.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
FinCo Services, a.s.
VAT number
SK7020000383
Registration number
35848979
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FinCo Services, a.s.
Description
Spoločnosť Broker Consulting založili v roku 1998 ľudia, ktorí chceli poskytovať nadštandardne kvalitné služby finančného plánovania, na ktoré sa klienti môžu spoľahnúť. Za štrnásť rokov sa z malej českej firmy vyvinula prosperujúca skupina firiem.
Key services
financial product brokerage, administrative and legal support, marketing support, training and e-learning, online insurance contract processing, commission management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery FullPage, jQuery Swipebox, Isotope, FlexSlider, GSAP TweenMax
Frameworks
jQuery-based UI frameworks
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Slovak language targeting financial intermediaries and clients.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  4. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage; contact is via email link.
  5. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses multiple JavaScript libraries for UI and animation but no analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No explicit security headers found in the HTML content; recommend adding for improved security posture.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is actively maintained with DNSSEC enabled.
  9. Company provides detailed legal documents accessible via PDF links.
  10. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a jQuery-centric technology stack with plugins for full-page scrolling, sliders, and animations, providing a visually engaging user experience. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with multiple JavaScript libraries loaded, but no heavy analytics or tracking scripts detected, which benefits privacy and speed. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but could be enhanced with structured data (JSON-LD) for richer search results. Technical risks include potential outdated libraries and lack of advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but offers opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fcservices.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fcservices.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.