Skip to main content

Security report for fcc-group.eu

FCC Environment CEE · Energy · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FCC Environment CEE is a prominent waste management company operating in Central and South East Europe, offering a wide range of services including municipal, business, household, and environmental waste solutions. The company emphasizes sustainability and resource efficiency, supported by ISO certifications and a clear mission statement. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with multimedia content, social media integration, and comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, though some security headers and explicit security policies are not publicly visible. The absence of WHOIS registrant data suggests privacy protection, which is justified for this business type. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fcc-group.eu

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FCC Environment CEE targets municipalities, industrial clients, commercial and retail sectors, and private customers across 7-8 countries in the CEE region. Their business model focuses on sustainable waste management and environmental services, leveraging certifications and a strong brand identity. The company maintains partnerships with global FCC entities and actively communicates through news, videos, and social media. Growth indicators include extensive infrastructure (trucks, plants, yards) and a large client base. The company’s strategic focus on resource efficiency and social responsibility aligns with current market trends in environmental services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers or incident response contacts are found, which could be improved. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but is managed via consent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, security maturity is moderate with room for enhancement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Provide explicit security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to foster responsible security reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FCC Environment CEE
Description
FCC Environment CEE is a leading sustainable waste management company in Central and South East Europe. They provide a broad spectrum of waste solutions for municipal, industrial, commercial, retail sectors and private customers in 8 countries. Their mission is to minimize waste and transform it into valuable resources, improving quality of life for present and future generations.
Key services
Municipal and citizen services, Business waste solutions, Household services, Environmental services and supports, Consulting and Engineering, Facility Management, Sewer and pit clearance, Waste to Resource (collection, transport, treatment, energy from waste, landfilling, composting)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Google reCAPTCHA, Fancybox, Slick Carousel, SCSS/CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • Google reCAPTCHA for form protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on environmental responsibility and sustainability
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools
  8. Certifications ISO 9001, 14001, OHSAS 18001 prominently displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery 3.6.0, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, and Google reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, with no common CMS detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The site uses SCSS for styling and includes multiple scripts for enhanced user interaction and analytics. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by improving security headers and reducing reliance on multiple third-party tracking scripts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fcc-group.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fcc-group.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.