Skip to main content

Security report for faz-konferenzen.de

F.A.Z. Konferenzen · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

F.A.Z. Konferenzen is a professional conference organizer associated with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung brand, focusing on providing exclusive platforms for decision makers in business, politics, and society. The website presents a professional image with good content quality and targets a specialized audience seeking high-level exchange and insights. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Borlabs Cookie, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned in its niche but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching faz-konferenzen.de

This scan found 25 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention faz-konferenzen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for faz-konferenzen.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media and events sector, leveraging the strong brand of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung to attract a medium-sized audience of professionals and decision makers. Its business model revolves around organizing conferences with high-profile speakers and practical content. The website reflects a stable market position with consistent branding and professional content. The use of multilingual plugins suggests an international or at least German-speaking European target market. No direct contact details or certifications were found, which could be improved to enhance credibility. The company appears to be relatively new, founded around 2020, aligning with the domain age.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security policies reduces transparency. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could be a potential area for improvement. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which if kept updated, reduce vulnerability risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were identified. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, which is a gap in security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user and data handling expectations.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
F.A.Z. Konferenzen
Description
Frankfurter Allgemeine Konferenzen geben relevanten Fragestellungen aus Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft einen neuen Raum. Sie bieten ihren Teilnehmern exklusive Plattformen mit hochkarätigen Sprechern, praxisnahen Inhalten und Möglichkeiten für den professionellen Austausch unter Entscheidern.
Key services
Konferenzen, Plattformen für professionellen Austausch, Praxisnahe Inhalte, Hochkarätige Sprecher
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Borlabs Cookie, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Essential Grid, WPML
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism via Borlabs Cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at decision makers in business and politics.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Borlabs Cookie plugin.
  5. No direct contact information (email, phone, address) found in the provided content.
  6. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Analytics and tracking tools are used with consent mechanisms.
  9. No security headers explicitly detected in the provided data.
  10. Domain WHOIS data is minimal but not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Borlabs Cookie for cookie management, Slider Revolution for visual content, and WPML for multilingual support. The site loads scripts asynchronously and uses preconnect hints for Google Fonts, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented. Hosting provider details are not explicit. The site could improve accessibility features and implement additional security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with faz-konferenzen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review faz-konferenzen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.