Skip to main content

Security report for fastighetsrantefonden.se

Fastighetsräntefonden · Finance · Sweden

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fastighetsräntefonden is a Swedish alternative investment fund specializing in secured real estate loans across Sweden. The fund targets medium and smaller real estate actors by providing financing solutions where traditional bank financing has become restrictive due to regulatory changes such as Basel III. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, offering a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the site lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data, but missing security headers and incident response information reduce the overall security maturity. Tracking technologies like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are used without visible consent mechanisms, indicating privacy compliance gaps. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business claims. Overall, the website is functional and credible but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fastighetsrantefonden.se

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance and real estate sectors, focusing on providing secured loans to Swedish real estate companies, especially medium and smaller actors who face financing gaps. Founded in 2013, the fund is listed on the Nordic Growth Market, indicating a regulated and transparent business model. The target audience includes private individuals, companies, discretionary management assignments, and professional investors. The business model revolves around pooling investor capital to finance real estate loans with underlying collateral, aiming for a 7-10% annual return. The website content and structure reflect a focused and consistent branding approach, with clear contact details and social media presence supporting trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The presence of tracking pixels without consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding privacy compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform and obtain user consent for tracking.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fastighetsräntefonden
Description
Fastighetsräntefonden is a Swedish alternative investment fund investing primarily in Swedish high-yield real estate-related loans secured by property collateral. The fund targets secured real estate credits across all property types in Sweden, focusing on sufficient yield, strong collateral, and competent borrowers. It is listed on the Nordic Growth Market (NGM).
Key services
Investment in secured Swedish real estate loans, Providing financing solutions for medium and smaller real estate companies, Offering a fund product approved for ISK (investment savings account)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.3.5, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating GDPR compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address
  4. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information available
  6. Tracking scripts for analytics and marketing are present without visible consent mechanism
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of the business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.3.5 using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, supported by Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site loads asynchronously for tracking scripts, improving performance. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized, with good SEO meta tags and structured content. However, no hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading of images. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fastighetsrantefonden.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fastighetsrantefonden.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.