Skip to main content

Security report for fashiontv.com

FashionTV+ · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FashionTV+ is a media streaming platform specializing in men's fashion and modeling industry content. The website offers video streaming services featuring top designers and models, targeting fashion enthusiasts. The business appears to be a medium-sized media entity with a long-established domain dating back to 1996, indicating a mature presence in the fashion media sector. The site uses modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted via EuroDNS S.A., and integrates third-party services like Castify for video delivery. While the technical infrastructure is modern and the site is accessible with good design and content relevance, there are notable gaps in privacy compliance and security best practices. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which could impact user trust and regulatory compliance. Security headers are missing, and DNSSEC is not enabled, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy, security, and transparency to strengthen its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fashiontv.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FashionTV+ operates in the niche media sector focused on fashion and modeling, leveraging video streaming as its primary service. The business model centers on content distribution and possibly advertising or subscription revenue streams. The target audience includes men interested in fashion trends and modeling industry insights. The company benefits from a long domain history and consistent branding, which supports market credibility. However, the lack of explicit business contact details and compliance documentation may limit partnership opportunities and user confidence. The platform integrates with Castify for video management, indicating a reliance on specialized third-party services. There is no evidence of affiliate programs or extensive marketing tools, suggesting a focused content delivery approach rather than aggressive monetization strategies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is fundamental for secure communications. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain hijacking protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, indicating potential non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security governance. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  5. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FashionTV+
Description
FashionTV brings you the stylish world of men's fashion. Top designers and the most dashing men in the modeling industry, and beautiful clothing
Key services
Fashion video streaming, Fashion event coverage, Modeling industry content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google IMA SDK, FontAwesome, Castify
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Castify
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a media streaming platform focused on men's fashion and modeling content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Uses modern web technologies including React and Next.js.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No visible forms for user data collection on the main page.
  7. No social media links or email addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is well-established and not privacy protected.
  9. No WAF or security challenge detected; site content is accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. It uses Castify for video streaming and Google IMA SDK for ad integration, showing a reliance on specialized third-party services for media delivery and monetization. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts, and FontAwesome is used for icons. The site is hosted with EuroDNS S.A., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance appears moderate with preloading and deferred scripts, but no explicit performance metrics were available. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and alt attributes present but no advanced accessibility indicators. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing and search engine visibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fashiontv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fashiontv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.