Skip to main content

Security report for fap18.net

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fap18.net is a free adult video streaming website established in 2017, offering a wide range of pornographic content categorized by genres and sources. The site targets adult users seeking free HD porn videos and operates primarily on an advertising-supported business model. It maintains a moderate market position among free adult tube sites with extensive external partnerships and affiliate links. Technically, the site uses common web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Yandex Metrika for analytics, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. The website is mobile-optimized with basic accessibility and SEO features but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but missing several best practices. Privacy compliance is poor, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Contact information is minimal, limited to an abuse reporting page. Overall, the site functions adequately but requires improvements in privacy, security, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fap18.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult media sector, providing free streaming of pornographic videos with a broad category and source listing. Its revenue likely derives from advertising and affiliate partnerships, as evidenced by numerous external links to partner sites. The target audience is adult consumers of free online porn content. The site has been active since 2017, indicating some market presence and operational stability. However, the lack of explicit business information, contact details, and privacy policies suggests limited corporate transparency. The extensive partner ecosystem supports content diversity and monetization but also increases external dependencies. Growth indicators are unclear due to limited public business data.

Security posture

The site enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS services, which provides a baseline of transport security and DNS reliability. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The only incident response channel is an abuse page, with no dedicated security contact or vulnerability disclosure policy. The use of multiple third-party analytics and sharing scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy, headers, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate vulnerabilities, and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Free porn videos site offering HD videos with categories such as 18 years old, teen, young, anal, milf, lesbian, and more.
Key services
Free streaming of adult videos, Video search, Categorized video browsing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, AddToAny sharing, LazySizes lazy loading
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
AddToAny
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult video streaming platform with extensive categories and sources.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating poor compliance with privacy regulations.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found; only an abuse reporting page is present.
  4. Uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers.
  5. Heavy use of third-party scripts for analytics and social sharing.
  6. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  7. Website design and UX are basic and functional but not professional-grade.
  8. Extensive external linking to many adult content partner sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with jQuery 3.5.1, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, and AddToAny for social sharing. It employs lazy loading for images via LazySizes, improving performance. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS and nameservers, providing reliable DNS resolution and some DDoS protection. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured data for search. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security practices. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in script loading and resource management. The site does not appear to use a CMS or modern web frameworks explicitly. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fap18.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fap18.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.