Skip to main content

Security report for familyofpower-mobility.com

FAMILY OF POWER · Energy · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FAMILY OF POWER operates a cooperative e-Carsharing service in Austria, focusing on sustainable and affordable electric vehicle sharing for municipalities, companies, housing communities, and private individuals. The business model integrates renewable energy communities and advertising partnerships to subsidize operational costs, positioning itself as a regional leader in eco-friendly mobility solutions. The website provides comprehensive information about services, pricing, partner networks, and community involvement, targeting environmentally conscious users and local stakeholders. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including jQuery, Foundation framework, lazy loading, and Google Maps API with explicit user consent for privacy compliance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, no CMS or hosting provider details are evident, and performance is moderate. From a security perspective, HTTPS is used, and privacy-conscious features like explicit consent for Google Maps are implemented. Nonetheless, the absence of visible security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicate room for improvement. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the site. Overall, the website is functional and informative but should address privacy compliance and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and security posture. Strategic improvements in security headers, policy disclosures, and WHOIS registration would strengthen the site's credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 29 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching familyofpower-mobility.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FAMILY OF POWER targets a niche market in Austria combining e-Carsharing with renewable energy communities, leveraging cooperative principles and regional partnerships. Their competitive advantage lies in affordable pricing supported by advertising partnerships and local engagement. The business model includes direct user memberships, municipal collaborations, and investment participation with dividends, indicating diversified revenue streams. The company fosters a community-centric ecosystem with operator, technology, and municipal partners, enhancing market reach and sustainability. Growth indicators include expanding vehicle fleets and energy community participation. The website content and partner network suggest a strategic focus on regional economic stimulation and environmental responsibility.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and enforces explicit user consent for loading third-party services like Google Maps, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant risk factor for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security culture appears basic with opportunities to enhance data protection practices, compliance with GDPR, and incident response preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration to ensure legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FAMILY OF POWER
Description
Preiswertes, flexibles FAMILY e-Carsharing ab € 3,84 pro Stunde mit € 0,12 pro km in Österreich für Gemeinden, Unternehmen, Wohnanlagen und Private.
Key services
e-Carsharing with electric vehicles, Energy communities with renewable energy tariffs, POWER Beteiligung (investment participation with dividends), Partner network for municipalities, operators, and technology providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation Sites, Blazy (lazy loading), Tooltipster, SweetAlert2, Slick Carousel, Google Maps API, MarkerClusterer
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Explicit user consent required before loading Google Maps (privacy conscious)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  4. No social media links detected.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain unregistered, which is unusual.
  7. Website uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks.
  8. Explicit user consent is required before loading Google Maps to comply with GDPR.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No visible security headers in HTML source; server headers unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Foundation framework, and Slick Carousel for UI components, with lazy loading for images and SweetAlert2 for user interactions. Google Maps integration is privacy-aware, requiring explicit user consent before loading. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or backend platform is identified, and hosting details are absent. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The technical debt appears low but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with familyofpower-mobility.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review familyofpower-mobility.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.